Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32054315›Full record

Trial reportAutism : the international journal of research and practice2020

Effects of pivotal response treatment on reciprocal vocal contingency in a randomized controlled trial of children with autism spectrum disorder.

Jena McDaniel, Paul Yoder, Madison Crandall, Maria Estefania Millan, Christina Mich Ardel, Grace W Gengoux, Antonio Y Hardan

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The use of Language ENvironment Analysis in autism research: A systematic review.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Everyday language input and production in 1,001 children from six continents.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jena McDanielThe University of Kansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4413-3780
Paul YoderVanderbilt University, USA.
Madison CrandallVanderbilt University, USA.
Maria Estefania MillanStanford University, USA.
Christina Mich ArdelStanford University, USA.
Grace W GengouxStanford University, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6942-9513
Antonio Y HardanStanford University, USA.
Stanford University · USVanderbilt University · USUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

Pivotal Response Treatment Package for Young Children with AutismR21DC013689 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HARDAN, ANTONIO · 2014 to 2015
$439k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC013689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lay abstractA recent randomized controlled trial found that children with autism spectrum disorder who received a pivotal response treatment package showed improved language and social communication skills following the intervention. The pivotal response treatment package includes clinician-delivered and parent-implemented strategies. Reciprocal vocal contingency is an automated measure of vocal reciprocity derived from daylong audio samples from the child's natural environment. It may provide stronger and complementary evidence of the effects of the pivotal response treatment package because it is at lower risk for detection bias than parent report and brief parent-child interaction measures. The current study compared reciprocal vocal contingency for 24 children with autism spectrum disorder in the pivotal response treatment package group and 24 children with autism spectrum disorder in the control group. The pivotal response treatment package group received 24 weeks of the pivotal response treatment package intervention. The control group received their usual intervention services during that time. The groups did not differ in reciprocal vocal contingency when the intervention started or after 12 weeks of intervention. However, after 24 weeks the pivotal response treatment package group had higher ranked reciprocal vocal contingency scores than the control group. These findings are consistent with results from parent report and parent-child interaction measures obtained during the trial. The participants in the pivotal response treatment package exhibited greater vocal responsiveness to adult vocal responses to their vocalizations than the control group. Findings support the effectiveness of the pivotal response treatment package on vocal reciprocity of children with autism spectrum disorder, which may be a pivotal skill for language development.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAdultCommunicationHumansLanguageLanguage DevelopmentParent-Child Relationsautism spectrum disordercommunication and languageinterventions–psychosocial/behavioralpre-school children

Identifiers

PMID32054315
PMCPMC7375927
OpenAlexW3006018175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.