Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32054293›Full record

SynthesisChronic respiratory disease

Nutritional supplementation during pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: A systematic review.

Abdulelah M Aldhahir, Ahmed M Al Rajeh, Yousef S Aldabayan, Salifu Drammeh, Vanitha Subbu, Jaber S Alqahtani, John R Hurst, Swapna Mandal

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Chronic respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Respiratory Muscle Strength and Mortality in Patients with COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Medical nutrition therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A narrative review.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Can Blood Biomarkers Be Used to Assess Oxidative Stress in COPD Patients After Pulmonary Rehabilitation.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdulelah M AldhahirUCL Respiratory, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4270-9494
Ahmed M Al RajehRespiratory Care Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Yousef S AldabayanRespiratory Care Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Salifu DrammehUCL Respiratory, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK.
Vanitha SubbuRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jaber S AlqahtaniUCL Respiratory, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK.
John R HurstUCL Respiratory, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK.
Swapna MandalRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
The Royal Free Hospital · GBKing Faisal University · SARoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uptake of nutritional supplementation during pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been limited by an absence of rigorous evidence-based studies supporting use. The objective was to report and summarise the current evidence supporting the use of nutritional supplementation to improve outcomes during PR in stable COPD patients. A systematic search was conducted up to 7 August 2019 (registration number CRD42018089142). The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines were used. Six databases were included: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online or MEDLARS Online, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Excerpta Medica dataBASE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Web of Science. This systematic search generated 580 initial matches, of which 22 studies (917 COPD participants) met the pre-specified criteria and were included. Sixteen of 19 studies that used nutritional supplements in addition to PR did not show additional benefit compared to PR alone when measuring exercise capacity. Nutritional supplements significantly increased body weight in 7 of 11 studies. Body mass index increased significantly in two of six studies. Handgrip strength did not improve, while quadriceps muscle strength significantly improved in 3 of 11 studies. Four of eight studies showed a significant improvement in inspiratory muscle function. Only 2 of 14 studies demonstrated a significant improvement in quality of life with supplementation in addition to PR. There remains insufficient evidence on the effect of nutritional supplementation on improving outcomes during PR in patients with COPD due to heterogeneity in supplements, outcome measures and PR programmes. Therefore, controversy remains and further research is needed.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsExerciseHumansNutritional SupportPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveTreatment OutcomeChronic obstructive pulmonary diseasenutritionnutritional supplementationpulmonary rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID32054293
PMCPMC7019390
OpenAlexW3006497467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.