Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32054287›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of health promotion : AJHP2020

Economic Evaluation of a Sun Protection Promotion Program in California Elementary Schools.

Richard T Meenan, Kim D Reynolds, David B Buller, Kim Massie, Julia Berteletti, Mary K Buller, Jeff Ashley, Xia Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of health promotion : AJHP, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Richard T MeenanCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4868-3368
Kim D ReynoldsSchool of Community & Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, USA.
David B BullerKlein Buendel, Inc, Lakewood, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7902-9129
Kim MassieSchool of Community & Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, USA.
Julia BertelettiKlein Buendel, Inc, Golden, CO, USA.
Mary K BullerKlein Buendel, Inc, Golden, CO, USA.
Jeff AshleySun Safety for Kids, Burbank, CA, USA.
Xia LiuKlein Buendel, Inc, Golden, CO, USA.

Funding

Translation of District Sun Safe Policies to SchoolsR01HD074416 · NICHD · CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY · PI BULLER, DAVID B, REYNOLDS, KIM DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD074416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn economic evaluation of Sun Safe Schools intervention designed to aid California elementary schools with implementing sun safety practices consistent with local board-approved policy.

designProgram cost analysis: intervention delivery and practice implementation.

settingCalifornia elementary schools (58 interventions and 60 controls). Principals at 52 intervention and 53 control schools provided complete implementation data.

participantsPrincipals completing pre-/postintervention surveys assessing practice implementation.

interventionPhone-based 45-minute session with a project coach on practice implementation, follow-up e-mails/phone contacts, $500 mini-grant. Schools chose from a list of 10 practices for implementation: ultraviolet monitoring, clothing, hats, and/or sunscreen recommendations, outdoor shade, class education, staff training and/or modeling, parent outreach, and resource allocation. The duration of intervention was 20 months. Rolling recruitment/intervention: February 2014 to December 2017. MEASURES: Intervention delivery and practice implementation costs. Correlations of school demographics and administrator beliefs with costs. ANALYSIS: Intervention delivery activities micro-costed. Implemented practices assessed using costing template.

resultsIntervention schools: 234 implemented practices, control schools: 157. Twenty-month delivery costs: $29 310; $16 653 (per school: $320) for project staff, mostly mini-grants and coaching time. Administrator costs: $12 657 (per school: $243). Per-student delivery costs: $1.01. Costs of implemented practices: $641 843 for intervention schools (per-school mean: $12 343, median: $6 969); $496 365 for controls (per-school mean: $9365, median: $3123). Delivery costs correlated with implemented practices (0.37,

conclusionCoaching of elementary school personnel can stimulate sun safety practice implementation at a reasonable cost. Findings can assist schools in implementing appropriate sun safety practices.

Indexed as

Skin NeoplasmsCaliforniaCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansProgram EvaluationSchool Health ServicesSchoolsSunscreening AgentsSunscreening Agentscancercostpolicyschoolssun protection

Identifiers

PMID32054287
PMCPMC13140769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.