ArticleAsian-Australasian journal of animal sciences2020
The effectiveness of genomic selection for milk production traits of Holstein dairy cattle.
Article in Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-wide analysis reveals differential admixture dynamics and historical demographic contractions in African cattle.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Association of NCOA6 Gene Polymorphism with Milk Production Traits in Chinese Holstein Cows.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Genomic Prediction of Milk Fat Percentage Among Crossbred Cattle in the Indian Subcontinent.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Estimation of genetic parameters for reproductive traits in Korean dairy cattle.Animal bioscience · 2025Article
- Different Breeding Values Under Uniform Environmental Condition for Milk Production Yield Traits in Holstein-Friesian Cows.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Article
- Multi-Trait Single-Step Genomic Prediction for Milk Yield and Milk Components for Polish Holstein Population.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Genomic Analysis, Progress and Future Perspectives in Dairy Cattle Selection: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
- Genomic Prediction of Additive and Dominant Effects on Wool and Blood Traits in Alpine Merino Sheep.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study was conducted to test the efficiency of genomic selection for milk production traits in a Korean Holstein cattle population.
methodsA total of 506,481 milk production records from 293,855 animals (2,090 heads with single nucleotide polymorphism information) were used to estimate breeding value by single step best linear unbiased prediction.
resultsThe heritability estimates for milk, fat, and protein yields in the first parity were 0.28, 0.26, and 0.23, respectively. As the parity increased, the heritability decreased for all milk production traits. The estimated generation intervals of sire for the production of bulls (LSB) and that for the production of cows (LSC) were 7.9 and 8.1 years, respectively, and the estimated generation intervals of dams for the production of bulls (LDB) and cows (LDC) were 4.9 and 4.2 years, respectively. In the overall data set, the reliability of genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) increased by 9% on average over that of estimated breeding value (EBV), and increased by 7% in cows with test records, about 4% in bulls with progeny records, and 13% in heifers without test records. The difference in the reliability between GEBV and EBV was especially significant for the data from young bulls, i.e. 17% on average for milk (39% vs 22%), fat (39% vs 22%), and protein (37% vs 22%) yields, respectively. When selected for the milk yield using GEBV, the genetic gain increased about 7.1% over the gain with the EBV in the cows with test records, and by 2.9% in bulls with progeny records, while the genetic gain increased by about 24.2% in heifers without test records and by 35% in young bulls without progeny records.
conclusionMore genetic gains can be expected through the use of GEBV than EBV, and genomic selection was more effective in the selection of young bulls and heifers without test records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.