Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32054181›Full record

ArticleAsian-Australasian journal of animal sciences2020

The effectiveness of genomic selection for milk production traits of Holstein dairy cattle.

Yun-Mi Lee, Chang-Gwon Dang, Mohammad Z Alam, You-Sam Kim, Kwang-Hyeon Cho, Kyung-Do Park, Jong-Joo Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yun-Mi LeeDepartment of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea.
Chang-Gwon DangDivision of Animal Breeding and Genetics, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Cheonan 31000, Korea.
Mohammad Z AlamDepartment of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea.
You-Sam KimDepartment of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea.
Kwang-Hyeon ChoKorea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries, Jeonju, 54874, Korea.
Kyung-Do ParkDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea.
Jong-Joo KimDepartment of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea.

Funding

Rural Development Administration PJ01268003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study was conducted to test the efficiency of genomic selection for milk production traits in a Korean Holstein cattle population.

methodsA total of 506,481 milk production records from 293,855 animals (2,090 heads with single nucleotide polymorphism information) were used to estimate breeding value by single step best linear unbiased prediction.

resultsThe heritability estimates for milk, fat, and protein yields in the first parity were 0.28, 0.26, and 0.23, respectively. As the parity increased, the heritability decreased for all milk production traits. The estimated generation intervals of sire for the production of bulls (LSB) and that for the production of cows (LSC) were 7.9 and 8.1 years, respectively, and the estimated generation intervals of dams for the production of bulls (LDB) and cows (LDC) were 4.9 and 4.2 years, respectively. In the overall data set, the reliability of genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) increased by 9% on average over that of estimated breeding value (EBV), and increased by 7% in cows with test records, about 4% in bulls with progeny records, and 13% in heifers without test records. The difference in the reliability between GEBV and EBV was especially significant for the data from young bulls, i.e. 17% on average for milk (39% vs 22%), fat (39% vs 22%), and protein (37% vs 22%) yields, respectively. When selected for the milk yield using GEBV, the genetic gain increased about 7.1% over the gain with the EBV in the cows with test records, and by 2.9% in bulls with progeny records, while the genetic gain increased by about 24.2% in heifers without test records and by 35% in young bulls without progeny records.

conclusionMore genetic gains can be expected through the use of GEBV than EBV, and genomic selection was more effective in the selection of young bulls and heifers without test records.

Indexed as

Generation IntervalGenomic Estimated Breeding Value (GEBV)HeritabilityMilk Production TraitsReliability

Identifiers

PMID32054181
PMCPMC7054615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.