Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32053990›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Beyond PSA: The Role of Prostate Health Index (phi).

Matteo Ferro, Ottavio De Cobelli, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Angelo Porreca, Gian Maria Busetto, Francesco Cantiello, Rocco Damiano, Riccardo Autorino, Gennaro Musi, Mihai Dorin Vartolomei and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer: From Diagnosis to Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Matteo FerroDivision of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Ottavio De CobelliDivision of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe LucarelliDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Angelo PorrecaDepartment of Urology, Abano Terme Hospital, 35031 Padua, Italy.
Gian Maria BusettoDepartment of Urology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy.
Francesco CantielloDepartment of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Rocco DamianoDepartment of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Riccardo AutorinoDivision of Urology, VCU Health System, Richmond, VA 23219, USA.
Gennaro MusiDivision of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Mihai Dorin VartolomeiDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Matteo MutoRadiotherapy Unit, "S. G. Moscati" Hospital, 83100 Avellino, Italy.
Daniela TerraccianoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 8031 Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWidespread use of prostate specific antigen (PSA) in screening procedures allowed early identification of an increasing number of prostate cancers (PCas), mainly including indolent cancer. Availability of different therapeutic strategies which have a very different impact on the patient's quality of life suggested a strong need for tools able to identify clinically significant cancer at diagnosis. Multi-parametric magnetic resonance showed very good performance in pre-biopsy diagnosis. However, it is an expensive tool and requires an experienced radiologist. In this context, a simple blood-based test is worth investigating. In this context, researchers focused their attention on the development of a laboratory test able to minimize overdiagnosis without losing the identification of aggressive tumors.

resultsRecent literature data on PCa biomarkers revealed a clear tendency towards the use of panels of biomarkers or a combination of biomarkers and clinical variables. Phi, the 4Kscore, and Stockholm3 as circulating biomarkers and the Mi-prostate score, Exo DX Prostate, and Select MD-X as urinary biomarker-based tests have been developed. In this scenario, phi is worthy of attention as a noninvasive test significantly associated with aggressive PCa.

conclusionsLiterature data showed that phi had good diagnostic performance to identify clinically significant (cs) PCa, suggesting that it could be a useful tool for personalized treatment decision-making. In this review, phi potentialities, limitations, and comparisons with other blood- and urinary-based tests were explored.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyHumansKallikreinsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRisk AssessmentBiomarkers, TumorKallikreinsKLK3 protein, humanProstate-Specific Antigenclinical significanceoverdiagnosisphiprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID32053990
PMCPMC7072791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.