Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32053958›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2020

Interactions between

Belén Carbonetto, Thibault Nidelet, Stéphane Guezenec, Marc Perez, Diego Segond, Delphine Sicard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Lactic acid bacteriumApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Synergistic Interaction BetweenFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Effect of Co-Fermentation withFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Distribution ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Belén CarbonettoSPO, University Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier Supagro, 34060 Montpellier, France.
Thibault NideletSPO, University Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier Supagro, 34060 Montpellier, France.
Stéphane GuezenecSPO, University Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier Supagro, 34060 Montpellier, France.
Marc PerezSPO, University Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier Supagro, 34060 Montpellier, France.
Diego SegondSPO, University Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier Supagro, 34060 Montpellier, France.
Delphine SicardSPO, University Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier Supagro, 34060 Montpellier, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-13-ALID-0005CSRD VA 1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sourdoughs harbor simple microbial communities usually composed of a few prevailing lactic acid bacteria species (LAB) and yeast species. However, yeast and LAB found in sourdough have been described as highly diverse. Even if LAB and yeast associations have been widely documented, the nature of the interactions between them has been poorly described. These interactions define the composition and structure of sourdough communities, and therefore, the characteristics of the final bread product. In this study, the nature of the interactions between strains of two commonly found sourdough yeast species,

Indexed as

breadKazachstania humilisLactobacillusmicrobial interactionsSaccharomyces cerevisiaesourdough

Identifiers

PMID32053958
PMCPMC7074792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.