Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32053681›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Additive effect of contrast and velocity suggests the role of strong excitatory drive in suppression of visual gamma response.

Elena V Orekhova, Andrey O Prokofyev, Anastasia Yu Nikolaeva, Justin F Schneiderman, Tatiana A Stroganova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena V OrekhovaMoscow State University of Psychology and Education, Center for Neurocognitive Research (MEG Center), Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0950-1613
Andrey O ProkofyevMoscow State University of Psychology and Education, Center for Neurocognitive Research (MEG Center), Moscow, Russia.
Anastasia Yu NikolaevaMoscow State University of Psychology and Education, Center for Neurocognitive Research (MEG Center), Moscow, Russia.
Justin F SchneidermanUniversity of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Neuroscience &Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4441-2360
Tatiana A StroganovaMoscow State University of Psychology and Education, Center for Neurocognitive Research (MEG Center), Moscow, Russia.
Moscow State University of Psychology & Education · RUSahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is commonly acknowledged that gamma-band oscillations arise from interplay between neural excitation and inhibition; however, the neural mechanisms controlling the power of stimulus-induced gamma responses (GR) in the human brain remain poorly understood. A moderate increase in velocity of drifting gratings results in GR power enhancement, while increasing the velocity beyond some 'transition point' leads to GR power attenuation. We tested two alternative explanations for this nonlinear input-output dependency in the GR power. First, the GR power can be maximal at the preferable velocity/temporal frequency of motion-sensitive V1 neurons. This 'velocity tuning' hypothesis predicts that lowering contrast either will not affect the transition point or shift it to a lower velocity. Second, the GR power attenuation at high velocities of visual motion can be caused by changes in excitation/inhibition balance with increasing excitatory drive. Since contrast and velocity both add to excitatory drive, this 'excitatory drive' hypothesis predicts that the 'transition point' for low-contrast gratings would be reached at a higher velocity, as compared to high-contrast gratings. To test these alternatives, we recorded magnetoencephalography during presentation of low (50%) and high (100%) contrast gratings drifting at four velocities. We found that lowering contrast led to a highly reliable shift of the GR suppression transition point to higher velocities, thus supporting the excitatory drive hypothesis. No effects of contrast or velocity were found in the alpha-beta range. The results have implications for understanding the mechanisms of gamma oscillations and developing gamma-based biomarkers of disturbed excitation/inhibition balance in brain disorders.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrainFemaleGamma RhythmHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetoencephalographyMaleNeuronsPhotic StimulationVisual CortexVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID32053681
PMCPMC7018047
OpenAlexW3005728808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.