Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32053657›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Microbial resolution of whole genome shotgun and 16S amplicon metagenomic sequencing using publicly available NEON data.

Kyle D Brumfield, Anwar Huq, Rita R Colwell, James L Olds, Menu B Leddy

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
18.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 198 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Microbial Omics.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Potential mechanisms ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kyle D BrumfieldMaryland Pathogen Research Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3234-3337
Anwar HuqMaryland Pathogen Research Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
Rita R ColwellMaryland Pathogen Research Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5432-1502
James L OldsSchar School, George Mason University, Arlington, Virginia, United States of America.
Menu B LeddyEssential Environmental and Engineering Systems, Huntington Beach, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7250-0088
University of Maryland, College Park · USCosmos Corporation (United States) · USEngineering Systems (United States) · USGeorge Mason University · US

Funding

Effects of climate change on prevalence and environmental niches of clinically important vibrios in the Chesapeak BayR01ES030317 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI HUQ, ANWAR · 2018 to 2022
$547k
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES030317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microorganisms are ubiquitous in the biosphere, playing a crucial role in both biogeochemistry of the planet and human health. However, identifying these microorganisms and defining their function are challenging. Widely used approaches in comparative metagenomics, 16S amplicon sequencing and whole genome shotgun sequencing (WGS), have provided access to DNA sequencing analysis to identify microorganisms and evaluate diversity and abundance in various environments. However, advances in parallel high-throughput DNA sequencing in the past decade have introduced major hurdles, namely standardization of methods, data storage, reproducible interoperability of results, and data sharing. The National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON), established by the National Science Foundation, enables all researchers to address queries on a regional to continental scale around a variety of environmental challenges and provide high-quality, integrated, and standardized data from field sites across the U.S. As the amount of metagenomic data continues to grow, standardized procedures that allow results across projects to be assessed and compared is becoming increasingly important in the field of metagenomics. We demonstrate the feasibility of using publicly available NEON soil metagenomic sequencing datasets in combination with open access Metagenomics Rapid Annotation using the Subsystem Technology (MG-RAST) server to illustrate advantages of WGS compared to 16S amplicon sequencing. Four WGS and four 16S amplicon sequence datasets, from surface soil samples prepared by NEON investigators, were selected for comparison, using standardized protocols collected at the same locations in Colorado between April-July 2014. The dominant bacterial phyla detected across samples agreed between sequencing methodologies. However, WGS yielded greater microbial resolution, increased accuracy, and allowed identification of more genera of bacteria, archaea, viruses, and eukaryota, and putative functional genes that would have gone undetected using 16S amplicon sequencing. NEON open data will be useful for future studies characterizing and quantifying complex ecological processes associated with changing aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaDatabases, GeneticDNA, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomeMetagenomicsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, RNASoilWhole Genome SequencingDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil

Identifiers

PMID32053657
PMCPMC7018008
OpenAlexW3005676248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.