Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32053632›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Using old antibiotics to treat ancient bacterium-β-lactams for Bacillus anthracis meningitis.

Assa Sittner, Amir Ben-Shmuel, Itai Glinert, Elad Bar-David, Josef Schlomovitz, David Kobiler, Shay Weiss, Haim Levy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Postexposure Prophylaxis and Treatment of Bacillus anthracis Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Animal Models, 1947-2019.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Assa SittnerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona, Israel.
Amir Ben-ShmuelDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona, Israel.
Itai GlinertDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona, Israel.
Elad Bar-DavidDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona, Israel.
Josef SchlomovitzDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona, Israel.
David KobilerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona, Israel.
Shay WeissDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona, Israel.
Haim LevyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-1902-8535
Israel Institute for Biological Research · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As Bacillus anthracis spores pose a proven bio-terror risk, the treatment focus has shifted from exposed populations to anthrax patients and the need for effective antibiotic treatment protocols increases. The CDC recommends carbapenems and Linezolid (oxazolidinone), for the treatment of anthrax, particularly for the late, meningeal stages of the disease. Previously we demonstrated that treatment with Meropenem or Linezolid, either as a single treatment or in combination with Ciprofloxacin, fails to protect rabbits from anthrax-meningitis. In addition, we showed that the failure of Meropenem was due to slow BBB penetration rather than low antibacterial activity. Herein, we tested the effect of increasing the dose of the antibiotic on treatment efficacy. We found that for full protection (88% cure rate) the dose should be increased four-fold from 40 mg/kg to 150 mg/kg. In addition, B. anthracis is a genetically stable bacterium and naturally occurring multidrug resistant B. anthracis strains have not been reported. In this manuscript, we report the efficacy of classical β-lactams as a single treatment or in combination with β-lactamase inhibitors in treating anthrax meningitis. We demonstrate that Ampicillin based treatment of anthrax meningitis is largely efficient (66%). The high efficacy (88-100%) of Augmentin (Amoxicillin and Clavulonic acid) and Unasyn (Ampicillin and Sulbactam) makes them a favorable choice due to reports of β-lactam resistant B. anthracis strains. Tazocin (Piperacillin and Tazobactam) proved inefficient compared to the highly efficient Augmentin and Unasyn.

Indexed as

Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate CombinationAmpicillinAnimalsAnthraxAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacillus anthracisBacteriabeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamsDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansMeropenemMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationRabbitsAmoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate CombinationAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamsMeropenemPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationSulbactamsultamicillin

Identifiers

PMID32053632
PMCPMC7018077
OpenAlexW3005888133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.