ArticlePloS one2020
Impacts of climate change on high priority fruit fly species in Australia.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The shibireInsect science · 2026Article
- Predicting the global distribution of Coffee Bee Hawk Moth (Cephanodes hylas L.) under climate change using MaxEnt.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Differences among populations and changes during domestication in the lipidome of Queensland fruit fly.BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Overwintering Capacity of the Mediterranean Fruit Fly in the Dalmatia Region of Croatia.Insects · 2025Article
- Prediction of the potentially suitable areas of Elymus dahuricus Turcz in China under climate change based on maxent.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Invasion History and Dispersion Dynamics of the Mediterranean Fruit Fly in the Balkan Peninsula.Insects · 2024Review
- Prediction of potential distributions ofEcology and evolution · 2024Article
- Review of surveillance systems for tephritid fruit fly threats in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States.Journal of economic entomology · 2024Review
- Metarhizium spp. isolates effective against Queensland fruit fly juvenile life stages in soil.PloS one · 2024Article
- A new genome sequence resource for five invasive fruit flies of agricultural concern:F1000Research · 2024Article
- Biosecurity and Management Strategies for Economically Important Exotic Tephritid Fruit Fly Species in Australia.Insects · 2023Review
- Potentially Suitable Geographical Area forInsects · 2023Article
- Competition: A Missing Component of Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Risk Assessment and Planning.Insects · 2022Review
- Developing Lines of Queensland Fruit Flies with Different Levels of Response to a Kairomone Lure.Insects · 2022Article
- Manipulating Insect Sex Determination Pathways for Genetic Pest Management: Opportunities and Challenges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Predicting the Invasion Risk by Anastrepha sororcula (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Distinct Geographic Regions.Neotropical entomology · 2021Article
- Global distribution of soapberries (Sapindus L.) habitats under current and future climate scenarios.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Predicting the Global Distribution ofInsects · 2021Article
- Dispersal and competitive release affect the management of native and invasive tephritid fruit flies in large and smallholder farms in Ethiopia.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tephritid fruit flies are among the most destructive horticultural pests posing risks to Australia's multi-billion-dollar horticulture industry. Currently, there are 11 pest fruit fly species of economic concern in Australia. Of these, nine are native to this continent (Bactrocera aquilonis, B. bryoniae, B. halfordiae, B. jarvisi, B. kraussi, B. musae, B. neohumeralis, B. tryoni and Zeugodacus cucumis), while B. frauenfeldi and Ceratitis capitata are introduced. To varying degrees these species are costly to Australia's horticulture through in-farm management, monitoring to demonstrate pest freedom, quarantine and trade restrictions, and crop losses. Here, we used a common species distribution model, Maxent, to assess climate suitability for these 11 species under baseline (1960-1990) and future climate scenarios for Australia. Projections indicate that the Wet Tropics is likely to be vulnerable to all 11 species until at least 2070, with the east coast of Australia also likely to remain vulnerable to multiple species. While the Cape York Peninsula and Northern Territory are projected to have suitable climate for numerous species, extrapolation to novel climates in these areas decreases confidence in model projections. The climate suitability of major horticulture areas currently in eastern Queensland, southern-central New South Wales and southern Victoria to these pests may increase as climate changes. By highlighting areas at risk of pest range expansion in the future our study may guide Australia's horticulture industry in developing effective monitoring and management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.