ArticlePloS one2020
A comparative approach for species delimitation based on multiple methods of multi-locus DNA sequence analysis: A case study of the genus Giraffa (Mammalia, Cetartiodactyla).
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- The variability of giraffe skull morphology.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
- Phylogeny of Cutthroat Trout (Evolutionary applications · 2026Article
- How many mammal species are there now? Updates and trends in taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic knowledge.Journal of mammalogy · 2025Article
- Influence of the Great Amazon Reef System and Pleistocene sea-level drops on the phylogeography ofPeerJ · 2025Article
- Hierarchical Heuristic Species Delimitation Under the Multispecies Coalescent Model with Migration.Systematic biology · 2024Article
- African bushpigs exhibit porous species boundaries and appeared in Madagascar concurrently with human arrival.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Hapsolutely: a user-friendly tool integrating haplotype phasing, network construction, and haploweb calculation.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Genomic analysis reveals limited hybridization among three giraffe species in Kenya.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Acknowledging more biodiversity without more species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Speciation on the Roof of the World: Parallel Fast Evolution of Cryptic Mole Vole Species in the Pamir-Alay-Tien Shan Region.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Surrounded by Kindred:Biology · 2023Article
- Genetic evidence of population subdivision among Masai giraffes separated by the Gregory Rift Valley in Tanzania.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Evaluating the effects of giraffe skin disease and wire snare wounds on the gaits of free-ranging Nubian giraffe.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Geographic Mosaic of Extensive Genetic Variations in Subterranean Mole VolesLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Expert range maps of global mammal distributions harmonised to three taxonomic authorities.Journal of biogeography · 2022Article
- Cryopreservation of Giraffe Epidydimal Spermatozoa Using Different Extenders and Cryoprotectants.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Article
- Evolutionary history of Carnivora (Mammalia, Laurasiatheria) inferred from mitochondrial genomes.PloS one · 2021Article
- Etorphine-Azaperone Immobilisation for Translocation of Free-Ranging Masai Giraffes (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular data are now commonly used in taxonomy for delimiting cryptic species. In the case of giraffes, which were treated as a single species (Giraffa camelopardalis) during half of a century, several molecular studies have suggested a splitting into four to seven species, but the criteria applied for taxonomic delimitation were not fully described. In this study, we have analysed all multi-locus DNA sequences available for giraffes using multispecies coalescent (MSC: *BEAST, BPP and STACEY), population genetic (STRUCTURE, allelic networks, haplotype network and bootstrapping, haplowebs and conspecificity matrix) and phylogenetic (MrBayes, PhyML, SuperTRI) methods to identify the number of species. Our results show that depending on the method chosen, different taxonomic hypotheses, recognizing from two to six species, can be considered for the genus Giraffa. Our results confirm that MSC methods can lead to taxonomic over-splitting, as they delimit geographic structure rather than species. The 3-species hypothesis, which recognizes G. camelopardalis sensu strico A, G. giraffa, and G. tippelskirchi, is highly supported by phylogenetic analyses and also corroborated by most population genetic and MSC analyses. The three species show high levels of nucleotide divergence in both nuclear (0.35-0.51%) and mitochondrial sequences (3-4%), and they are characterised by 7 to 12 exclusive synapomorphies (ES) detected in nine of the 21 nuclear introns analysed for this study. By contrast, other putative species, such as G. peralta, G. reticulata, G. thornicrofti or G. tippelskirchi sensu stricto, do not exhibit any ES in the nuclear genes. A robust mito-nuclear conflict was found for the position and monophyly of G. giraffa and G. tippelskirchi, which is interpreted as the result of a mitochondrial introgression from Masai to southeastern giraffe during the Pleistocene and nuclear gene flow mediated by male dispersal between southern populations (subspecies G. g. giraffa and G. g. angolensis).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.