SynthesisMMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports2020
Guidelines for the Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2020.
Synthesis in MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 267 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
267 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 471 citations in OpenAlex.
- S3 Guideline for the Treatment of Psoriasis vulgaris, adapted from EuroGuiDerm - part 2: Specific clinical and comorbid situations.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026Guideline
- Infection risk in inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with vedolizumab: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Acceptance of preventive therapy for latent tuberculosis infection in Chinese children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Isoniazid use, effectiveness, and safety for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of different regimens in the treatment of patients with latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of high-dose isoniazid-containing therapy for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness of 3-months isoniazid and rifapentine compared to 9-months isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2022Pooled it
- Prevalence of Latent Tuberculosis Infection Among Persons with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Clinical testing of drug treatment shortening in patients with TB using PET/CT imaging of lung lesions.Science translational medicine · 2026Trial
- Costs of 4 Months of Rifampin Versus 2 Months of Double-dose Rifampin for Tuberculosis Infection: Post-Hoc Analysis of a Phase 2b Randomized Trial.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Trial
- Completion of tuberculosis preventive treatment with 300 mg vs. 100 mg isoniazid tablets: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Trial
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Clinical Guidelines Versus Interactive Decision-Support for Improving Medical Trainees' Confidence with Latent Tuberculosis Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Trial
- Migratory Pulmonary Infiltrates Mimicking Malignancy, Tuberculosis, and Sarcoidosis in an Apparently Immunocompetent Adult: A Case of Tissue-Proven Invasive Fungal Disease Due to a Non-Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Infection prophylaxis following anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in childhood kidney diseases.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Antimicrobial peptides for tuberculosis in a post-antibiotic era: from in vitro promise to therapeutic potential.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2026Review
- Optimizing Latent Tuberculosis Treatment Strategies Among Immigrants From High-Burden Settings.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Context-dependent risk stratification using a tuberculin skin test induration threshold of ≥ 15 mm in school tuberculosis screening in Hangzhou, China: a historical cohort study.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Article
- Progression to active TB post-TB preventive treatment among household contacts in India: Axshya Plus project (2021-2024).IJTLD open · 2026Article
- Infectious Disease Provider Perspectives on Shorter Tuberculosis Treatment Regimens.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Efficacy of a Brief Educational Video for Patients Prescribed Latent Tuberculosis Treatment: A Randomized Trial in the United States.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
207 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comprehensive guidelines for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among persons living in the United States were last published in 2000 (American Thoracic Society. CDC targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:S221-47). Since then, several new regimens have been evaluated in clinical trials. To update previous guidelines, the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association (NTCA) and CDC convened a committee to conduct a systematic literature review and make new recommendations for the most effective and least toxic regimens for treatment of LTBI among persons who live in the United States.The systematic literature review included clinical trials of regimens to treat LTBI. Quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low) from clinical trial comparisons was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. In addition, a network meta-analysis evaluated regimens that had not been compared directly in clinical trials. The effectiveness outcome was tuberculosis disease; the toxicity outcome was hepatotoxicity. Strong GRADE recommendations required at least moderate evidence of effectiveness and that the desirable consequences outweighed the undesirable consequences in the majority of patients. Conditional GRADE recommendations were made when determination of whether desirable consequences outweighed undesirable consequences was uncertain (e.g., with low-quality evidence).These updated 2020 LTBI treatment guidelines include the NTCA- and CDC-recommended treatment regimens that comprise three preferred rifamycin-based regimens and two alternative monotherapy regimens with daily isoniazid. All recommended treatment regimens are intended for persons infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis that is presumed to be susceptible to isoniazid or rifampin. These updated guidelines do not apply when evidence is available that the infecting M. tuberculosis strain is resistant to both isoniazid and rifampin; recommendations for treating contacts exposed to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis were published in 2019 (Nahid P, Mase SR Migliori GB, et al. Treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. An official ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;200:e93-e142). The three rifamycin-based preferred regimens are 3 months of once-weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine, 4 months of daily rifampin, or 3 months of daily isoniazid plus rifampin. Prescribing providers or pharmacists who are unfamiliar with rifampin and rifapentine might confuse the two drugs. They are not interchangeable, and caution should be taken to ensure that patients receive the correct medication for the intended regimen. Preference for these rifamycin-based regimens was made on the basis of effectiveness, safety, and high treatment completion rates. The two alternative treatment regimens are daily isoniazid for 6 or 9 months; isoniazid monotherapy is efficacious but has higher toxicity risk and lower treatment completion rates than shorter rifamycin-based regimens.In summary, short-course (3- to 4-month) rifamycin-based treatment regimens are preferred over longer-course (6-9 month) isoniazid monotherapy for treatment of LTBI. These updated guidelines can be used by clinicians, public health officials, policymakers, health care organizations, and other state and local stakeholders who might need to adapt them to fit individual clinical circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.