Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32053113›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Evaluating Mechanisms of Postoperative Delirium and Cognitive Dysfunction Following Elective Spine Surgery in Elderly Patients (CONFESS): Protocol for a Prospective Observational Trial.

Jonas Müller, Stephan Nowak, Antje Vogelgesang, Bettina von Sarnowski, Eiko Rathmann, Sein Schmidt, Sebastian Rehberg, Taras Usichenko, Harry Kertscho, Klaus Hahnenkamp and 4 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03486288 (Kognitive Störungen Nach Elektiver Wirbelsäulenchirurgie Bei Älteren), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03486288 terminatednot on this map

Kognitive Störungen Nach Elektiver Wirbelsäulenchirurgie Bei Älteren

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Medicine GreifswaldRan2018 to 2021Enrolled124ConditionsCognitive Impairment, Postoperative Delirium, Spine Fusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonas MüllerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4915-8445
Stephan NowakDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0856-6768
Antje VogelgesangDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2984-0831
Bettina von SarnowskiDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1458-476X
Eiko RathmannDepartment of Radiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0023-917X
Sein SchmidtClinical Research Unit, Charité Campus Mitte, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6698-5717
Sebastian RehbergDepartment of Anesthesiology, Protestant Hospital of the Bethel Foundation, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5835-7083
Taras UsichenkoDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6173-5436
Harry KertschoDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6530-648X
Klaus HahnenkampDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2905-0362
Agnes FlöelDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1475-5872
Henry Ws SchroederDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9095-1517
Jan-Uwe MüllerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9342-5942
Robert FleischmannDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8159-2658
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEEvangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElderly people are at particular high risk for postoperative delirium (POD) following spine surgery, which is associated with longer hospital stays, higher costs, risk for delayed complications, long-term care dependency, and cognitive dysfunction (POCD). It is insufficiently understood which mechanisms and risk factors contribute to the development of POD and POCD following these major but plannable surgeries.

objectiveThis study aims to identify modifiable risk factors in spine surgery. A better understanding thereof would help adapt medical management and surgical strategies to individual risk profiles.

methodsThis is a single-center observational study jointly conducted by the departments of neurosurgery, neurology, and anesthesiology at a tertiary care hospital in Germany. All patients aged 60 years and older presenting to the neurosurgery outpatient clinic or ward for elective spine surgery are screened for eligibility. Exclusion criteria include presence of neurodegenerative or history of psychiatric disease and medication with significant central nervous system activity (eg, antidepressants, antipsychotics, sedatives). Surgical and anesthetic procedures including duration of surgery as primary end point of this study are thoroughly documented. All patients are furthermore evaluated for their preoperative cognitive abilities by a number of tests, including the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Plus test battery. Physical, mental, and social health and well-being are assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Profile 29 and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Patients additionally receive preoperative cerebrovascular ultrasound and structural and functional brain imaging. The immediate postoperative period includes screening for POD using the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale and validation through Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition, criteria. We furthermore investigate markers of (neuro)inflammation (eg, interleukins, C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor alpha). Preoperative examinations are repeated 3 months postoperatively to investigate the presence of POCD and its mechanisms. Statistical analyses will compare delirious and nondelirious patients for predictors of immediate (POD) and delayed (POCD) cognitive dysfunction.

resultsThis is the first study to prospectively evaluate risk factors for POD and POCD in spine surgery. Recruitment is ongoing, and data collection is estimated to be finished with the inclusion of 200 patients by mid-2020.

conclusionsThe identification of mechanisms, possibly common, underlying POD and POCD would be a major step toward defining effective interventional strategies early in or even before the postoperative period, including the adaptation of surgical strategies to individual risk profiles.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03486288; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03486288. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/15488.

Indexed as

magnetic resonance imagingneuroinflammationpostoperative cognitive dysfunctionpostoperative deliriumquality of liferesting-state connectivityspine surgery

Identifiers

PMID32053113
PMCPMC7048391
OpenAlexW3005945313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.