ArticleTurkish journal of urology2020
The role of conventional urodynamic in diagnosing specific types of urinary incontinence in women.
Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of Clinical Outcome in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Who Underwent Transvaginal Mesh Reconstruction Surgery.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Can conventional urodynamic variables help to predict the necessity of overactive bladder symptomatic therapy in women after transobturator tape surgery?Central European journal of urology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the association between patient history profile, conventional urodynamic variables, and specific types of urinary incontinence (UI) in order to establish the role of urodynamic in differentiating various types of UI in women. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study enrolled 547 women with UI. All patients were divided into three groups according to the UI type based on questionnaires: stress UI (SUI), mixed UI (MixUI), and urgent UI (UUI). Patient history taking, physical examination, and conventional urodynamics were performed. The association between patient profile characteristics, urodynamic data, and type of UI were assessed using one-way analysis of variance and chi-square tests.
resultsSignificant correlations were observed between the age, body mass index (BMI), cystocele, menopausal status, and most urodynamic data in at least one UI group (p<0.05). Age differed among all three groups (p<0.001), with SUI group consisting the youngest patients. BMI was higher in the MixUI group (p=0.001). The maximum cystometric capacity differed among all three groups (p<0.001), with the highest in the SUI. The maximum flow rate was higher in the SUI group than that in the UUI group (p<0.001). Residual urine, opening detrusor pressure, and pressure transmission ratio were significantly higher in the UUI group. Detrusor overactivity and menopause were less frequently observed in the SUI group. The least pronounced urodynamic SUI was found in the UUI group. Spearman correlation for cystocele was negative in the SUI and positive in the UUI group.
conclusionConventional urodynamics give additional information to correctly diagnose specific types of UI in women.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.