Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32053095›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of urology2020

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of size-independent BPH: A single-center experience of 600 cases.

Serdar Yalçın, Sercan Yılmaz, Eymen Gazel, Engin Kaya, Tahsin Batuhan Aydoğan, Halil Çağrı Aybal, Lütfi Tunç

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reasons to overthrow TURP: bring on Aquablation.World journal of urology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Early experience of "Urology annals
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Serdar YalçınDepartment of Urology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4586-7591
Sercan YılmazDepartment of Urology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6820-6708
Eymen GazelClinic of Urology, Acıbadem Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6483-9249
Engin KayaDepartment of Urology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5272-572X
Tahsin Batuhan AydoğanDepartment of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2000-7790
Halil Çağrı AybalClinic of Urology, Yurtaslan Oncology Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9123-6139
Lütfi TunçDepartment of Urology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7338-3909
Gülhane Askerî Tıp Akademisi · TRAcıbadem Adana Hospital · TRAli Osman Sonmez Oncology Hospital · TRGazi University · TRUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHolmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is an endourologic minimal invasive intervention of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). The interest on HoLEP is increasing in the literature. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the learning curve and our preliminary results. MATERIAL AND

methodsA retrospective analysis on 600 patients with BPH who underwent HoLEP between July 2015 and April 2019 was performed. Perioperative measures including enucleation efficiency (EE), morcellation efficiency (ME), and percentage of resected tissue weight (PRW) were recorded. Hospitalization time (HT) and catheterization time (CT) were measured. Functional outcomes, Clavien-Dindo classification complications, and continence status were assessed at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up.

resultsThe mean age, prostate size, and prostate-specific antigen levels of the patients were 64.54 years, 91 g, and 4.54 ng/mL, respectively. There were 38.3% of patients with ≥100 g prostate size. The measured EE, ME, and PRW were 1.12 g/min, 4 g/min, and 72%, respectively. The mean HT and CT were 24.53 h and 21.50 h, respectively. Functional outcomes showed significant improvement at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were comparable with the literature. The most common perioperative complication was superficial bladder mucosal injury (n=8, 1.33%). Only one patient had persistent stress urinary incontinence at 6-month follow-up.

conclusionAs mentioned in the literature, HoLEP indications are independent from prostate size. Our results showed similarity with the literature on functional outcomes, complication rates, and continence status. With its superior results, our HoLEP series from Turkey supports that HoLEP will replace transurethral resection of the prostate as the known current gold standard.

Identifiers

PMID32053095
PMCPMC7219966
OpenAlexW3001055593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.