Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32052867›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2020

Interventions to increase adherence to micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy: a protocol for a systematic review.

Filomena Gomes, Gilles Bergeron, Megan W Bourassa, Diana Dallmann, Jenna Golan, Kristen M Hurley, Shannon E King, Ana Carolina Feldenheimer da Silva, Saurabh Mehta

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Filomena GomesThe New York Academy of Sciences, New York City, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-1702-1433
Gilles BergeronThe New York Academy of Sciences, New York City, New York.
Megan W BourassaThe New York Academy of Sciences, New York City, New York.
Diana DallmannSchool of Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7462-579X
Jenna GolanDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Kristen M HurleyJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Shannon E KingJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-9709-3562
Ana Carolina Feldenheimer da SilvaDepartment of Nutrition in Public Health, the University of State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Saurabh MehtaDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-3788-0665
New York Academy of Sciences · USCornell University · USJohns Hopkins University · USMcGill University · CAUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

NUTRITION TRAININGT32DK007158 · NIDDK · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI PATRICIA A CASSANO, Julia L. Finkelstein · 1986 to 2026
$7.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy has been shown to be a cost-effective method to reduce the risk of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. However, one of the main barriers to the successful implementation of a micronutrient supplementation program in pregnancy is poor adherence. Our review will assess the effectiveness of interventions designed to increase adherence to micronutrient supplements in pregnancy. Following the Cochrane Collaboration Methodology, we will start by conducting the literature searches on Medline (via PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, in addition to sources of gray literature, to retrieve all the available relevant studies. We will include randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies with a control group, where participants are pregnant women taking any micronutrient supplements in the context of antenatal care globally. We will include studies with targeted interventions designed to improve adherence to micronutrient supplementation in pregnant women compared with (1) usual care or no intervention or (2) other targeted micronutrient adherence intervention. Abstract selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (according to the type of studies) will be conducted by two independent reviewers. The pooled results will be reported using the standardized mean differences for continuous data, and odds ratio or risk ratio for dichotomous data. We will assess sources of heterogeneity and publication bias. By following this protocol, we will systematically assess and synthesize the existing evidence about interventions designed to increase adherence to micronutrient supplementation in pregnant women. Understanding which strategies are more effective to increase the consumption of micronutrient supplements during this critical stage of life will have significant implications for clinicians and policymakers involved in the delivery of prenatal micronutrient supplementation interventions.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsMicronutrientsPatient ComplianceReview Literature as TopicFemaleHumansPregnancyMicronutrientsadherencecompliancemicronutrientspregnancysupplementation

Identifiers

PMID32052867
PMCPMC7384083
OpenAlexW3006540537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.