Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32052783›Full record

ArticleRadiography (London, England : 1995)2020

Evidence-based radiography: A new methodology or the systematisation of an old practice?

A F C L Abrantes, L P V Ribeiro, C A da Silva, A England, K B Azevedo, R P P Almeida, M V Canha Reis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiography (London, England : 1995), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

A F C L AbrantesUniversity of Algarve, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy of the Health School, Portugal; CICS.NOVA, Interdisciplinary Center of Social Sciences, Évora Cluster, Portugal; Centre for Research and Development in Health, University of Algarve, Portugal. Electronic address: aabrantes@ualg.pt.
L P V RibeiroUniversity of Algarve, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy of the Health School, Portugal; Centre for Research and Development in Health, University of Algarve, Portugal; CIDAF, Research Unit for Sport and Physical Activity, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
C A da SilvaUniversity of Évora, Sociology Department, Portugal.
A EnglandUniversity of Salford, Centre for Health Sciences Research, United Kingdom.
K B AzevedoUniversity of Algarve, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy of the Health School, Portugal; CICS.NOVA, Interdisciplinary Center of Social Sciences, Évora Cluster, Portugal; Centre for Research and Development in Health, University of Algarve, Portugal.
R P P AlmeidaUniversity of Algarve, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy of the Health School, Portugal; CICS.NOVA, Interdisciplinary Center of Social Sciences, Évora Cluster, Portugal; Centre for Research and Development in Health, University of Algarve, Portugal.
M V Canha ReisUniversity of Algarve, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy of the Health School, Portugal.
University of Algarve · PTAlgarve Biomedical Center · PTUniversity of Évora · PTUniversity of Salford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEvidence based radiography (EBR) is the logical development of evidence based practice applied to radiography. The aim of this study was to investigate the opinion of a cohort of Portuguese radiographers in Southern Portugal working in public hospitals regarding evidence based practice (EBP), namely about the levels of knowledge about EBR, how they access information and how they use it within daily practice.

methodsA self-administered questionnaire was applied to a sample of 40 radiographers in the Portuguese region of Algarve. This questionnaire was validated for Portuguese speakers using the translation-retranslation method.

resultsThe final response rate was 69% (40/58). Results suggest that most radiographers trained EBR during their undergraduate training. Although, no statistically significant correlations were found in the practice of EBR against participant gender, age, training, career level, reading papers and workplace. The most frequent reason to read papers is the "interest" to do so, and national professional journals are read more often. It was found that radiographers that read scientific papers more frequently know more about research (p = 0.005), understand the importance of research for the professional activity (p = 0.023), and know more on how to conduct research papers (p = 0.034).

conclusionEBR within radiography is not yet well established, and radiographers' have varying viewpoints. Radiographers that read scientific papers more frequently understand better the philosophy behind this concept but it is very important to deepen the knowledge on this area. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: When practicing radiography based on the best available scientific knowledge, professionals are ensuring the best for patients and for profession. To achieve this, and before taking any action, it is important to evaluate the current situation, and this research presents a way to do so.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingEducation, ContinuingAdultAllied Health PersonnelEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHumansMalePortugalSurveys and QuestionnairesEvidence based radiographyScientific readingScientific research

Identifiers

PMID32052783
OpenAlexW2981086913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.