Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32052642›Full record

ReviewCartilage2021

Particulated Cartilage for Chondral and Osteochondral Repair: A Review.

Bjørn Borsøe Christensen, Morten Lykke Olesen, Kris Tvilum Chadwick Hede, Natasja Leth Bergholt, Casper Bindzus Foldager, Martin Lind

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cartilage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Particulate cartilage and platelet-rich plasma treatment for knee chondral defects in sheep.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  17. Biologic principles of minced cartilage implantation: a narrative review.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bjørn Borsøe ChristensenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Horsens Regional Hospital, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3207-4536
Morten Lykke OlesenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Horsens Regional Hospital, Denmark.
Kris Tvilum Chadwick HedeOrthopedic Research Laboratory, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3309-5320
Natasja Leth BergholtOrthopedic Research Laboratory, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Casper Bindzus FoldagerDepartment of orthopedic surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Martin LindDepartment of orthopedic surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7204-813X
Aarhus University Hospital · DKRegional Hospital Horsens · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInjuries to articular cartilage have a poor spontaneous repair potential and no gold standard treatment exist. Particulated cartilage, both auto- and allograft, is a promising new treatment method that circumvents the high cost of scaffold- and cell-based treatments. MATERIALS AND

methodsA comprehensive database search on particulated cartilage was performed.

resultsFourteen animal studies have found particulated cartilage to be an effective treatment for cartilage injuries. Many studies suggest that juvenile cartilage has increased regenerative potential compared to adult cartilage. Sixteen clinical studies on 4 different treatment methods have been published. (1) CAIS, particulated autologous cartilage in a scaffold, (2) Denovo NT, juvenile human allograft cartilage embedded in fibrin glue, (3) autologous cartilage chips-with and without concomitant bone grafting, and (4) augmented autologous cartilage chips.

conclusionImplantation of allogeneic and autologous particulated cartilage provides a low cost and effective treatment alternative to microfracture and autologous chondrocyte implantation. The methods are promising, but large randomized controlled studies are needed.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularAnimalsBone TransplantationTransplantation, AutologousTransplantation, Homologouscartilage chipscartilage repairminced cartilageparticulated cartilageparticulated juvenile articular cartilagerepair

Identifiers

PMID32052642
PMCPMC8808866
OpenAlexW3006355532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.