Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32052532›Full record

ArticleChemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry2020

The Atomic Partial Charges Arboretum: Trying to See the Forest for the Trees.

Minsik Cho, Nitai Sylvetsky, Sarah Eshafi, Golokesh Santra, Irena Efremenko, Jan M L Martin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Uranium(III) and Uranium(IV)Inorganic chemistry · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Minsik ChoDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100, Rehovot, Israel.
Nitai SylvetskyDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100, Rehovot, Israel.
Sarah EshafiDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100, Rehovot, Israel.
Golokesh SantraDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100, Rehovot, Israel.
Irena EfremenkoDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100, Rehovot, Israel.
Jan M L MartinDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-0005-5074
Weizmann Institute of Science · ILBrown University · US

Funding

Feinberg Graduate SchoolIsrael Science Foundation 1358/15Kupcynet-Getz International Summer School at the Weizmann Institute of Science
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atomic partial charges are among the most commonly used interpretive tools in quantum chemistry. Dozens of different 'population analyses' are in use, which are best seen as proxies (indirect gauges) rather than measurements of a 'general ionicity'. For the GMTKN55 benchmark of nearly 2,500 main-group molecules, which span a broad swathe of chemical space, some two dozen different charge distributions were evaluated at the PBE0 level near the 1-particle basis set limit. The correlation matrix between the different charge distributions exhibits a block structure; blocking is, broadly speaking, by charge distribution class. A principal component analysis on the entire dataset suggests that nearly all variation can be accounted for by just two 'principal components of ionicity': one has all the distributions going in sync, while the second corresponds mainly to Bader QTAIM vs. all others. A weaker third component corresponds to electrostatic charge models in opposition to the orbital-based ones. The single charge distributions that have the greatest statistical similarity to the first principal component are iterated Hirshfeld (Hirshfeld-I) and a minimal-basis projected modification of Bickelhaupt charges. If three individual variables, rather than three principal components, are to be identified that contain most of the information in the whole dataset, one representative for each of the three classes of Corminboeuf et al. is needed: one based on partitioning of the density (such as QTAIM), a second based on orbital partitioning (such as NPA), and a third based on the molecular electrostatic potential (such as HLY or CHELPG).

Indexed as

atoms in moleculescharge distributionsmolecular modellingpopulation analysisprincipal components of ionicity

Identifiers

PMID32052532
PMCPMC7317385
OpenAlexW3005765690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.