ArticleHealth services research2020
A comparison of methods for health policy evaluation with controlled pre-post designs.
Article in Health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The local impacts of coal and oil power plant retirements on air pollution and cardiorespiratory health in California: An application of generalized synthetic control method.Environmental research · 2023Pooled it
- Guide to recent advances in difference-in-differences methodology for population health studies.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2026Article
- Medicaid Expansion and Severe Maternal Morbidity During Delivery Hospitalizations.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- The impact of elective surgical hubs on elective surgery in acute hospital trusts in England.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Applying a two-stage generalized synthetic control approach to quantify the heterogeneous health effects of extreme weather events: A 2018 large wildfire in California event as a case study.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
- A synthetic control evaluation of the use of pulse oximeters in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in England.PloS one · 2025Article
- More doctors, better health? A generalised synthetic control approach to estimating impacts of increasing doctors under Brazil's Mais Medicos programme.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2024Article
- The impact of financial incentives promoting biosimilar products in oncology: A quasi-experimental study using administrative data.PloS one · 2024Article
- A comparison of quasi-experimental methods with data before and after an intervention: an introduction for epidemiologists and a simulation study.International journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- A comparison of synthetic control approaches for the evaluation of policy interventions using observational data: Evaluating the impact of redesigning urgent and emergency care in Northumberland.Health services research · 2023Article
- Dealing with confounding in observational studies: A scoping review of methods evaluated in simulation studies with single-point exposure.Statistics in medicine · 2023Article
- A comparison of four quasi-experimental methods: an analysis of the introduction of activity-based funding in Ireland.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- The long-run effects of diagnosis related group payment on hospital lengths of stay in a publicly funded health care system: Evidence from 15 years of micro data.Health economics · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the mental health impacts of Universal Credit: protocol for a mixed methods study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Effectiveness Evaluation of a Primary School-Based Intervention against Heatwaves in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- A Quasi-Experimental Study of Medicaid Expansion and Urban Mortality in the American Northeast.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Evaluating the power of the causal impact method in observational studies of HCV treatment as prevention.Statistical communications in infectious diseases · 2021Article
- A comparison of methods for health policy evaluation with controlled pre-post designs.Health services research · 2020Article
- The Long-Term Impacts of an Integrated Care Programme on Hospital Utilisation among Older Adults in the South of England: A Synthetic Control Study.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare interactive fixed effects (IFE) and generalized synthetic control (GSC) methods to methods prevalent in health policy evaluation and re-evaluate the impact of the hip fracture best practice tariffs introduced for hospitals in England in 2010. DATA SOURCES: Simulations and Hospital Episode Statistics. STUDY
designBest practice tariffs aimed to incentivize providers to deliver care in line with guidelines. Under the scheme, 62 providers received an additional payment for each hip fracture admission, while 49 providers did not. We estimate the impact using difference-in-differences (DiD), synthetic control (SC), IFE, and GSC methods. We contrast the estimation methods' performance in a Monte Carlo simulation study. PRINCIPAL
findingsUnlike DiD, SC, and IFE methods, the GSC method provided reliable estimates across a range of simulation scenarios and was preferred for this case study. The introduction of best practice tariffs led to a 5.9 (confidence interval: 2.0 to 9.9) percentage point increase in the proportion of patients having surgery within 48 hours and a statistically insignificant 0.6 (confidence interval: -1.4 to 0.4) percentage point reduction in 30-day mortality.
conclusionsThe GSC approach is an attractive method for health policy evaluation. We cannot be confident that best practice tariffs were effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.