Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32052372›Full record

Trial reportCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2020

Video Modeling and Video Feedback to Reduce Time to Perform Intravenous Cannulation in Medical Students: A Randomized-Controlled Mixed-Methods Study.

Julie Yu, Calvin Lo, Claudia Madampage, Jagmeet Bajwa, Jennifer O'Brien, Paul Olszynski, Malcolm Lucy

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie YuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, G525-103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W8, Canada. julie.l.yu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6575-774X
Calvin LoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, G525-103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W8, Canada.
Claudia MadampageDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, G525-103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W8, Canada.
Jagmeet BajwaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, G525-103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W8, Canada.
Jennifer O'BrienDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, G525-103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W8, Canada.
Paul OlszynskiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Malcolm LucyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, G525-103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W8, Canada.
Royal University Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCombined video modeling (VM) and video feedback (VF) may be more beneficial than traditional feedback when teaching procedural skills. This study examined whether repeated VM and VF compared with VM alone reduced the time required for medical students to perform peripheral intravenous (IV) cannulation.

methodsTwenty-five novice medical students were randomly assigned to groups in a one-way blinded embedded mixed-methods study to perform IV cannulation. Participants received standardized instruction and performed IV cannulation on each other while being audio-video recorded. They were assigned to review a video of an expert performing IV cannulation (VM alone), or both the expert video and a video of their own most recent IV cannulation (VM+VF), before returning to perform another IV cannulation. This was repeated for a total of four IV cannulation encounters and three video reviews. A post-test interview was also conducted and analyzed qualitatively using thematic content analysis.

resultsThe median [interquartile range] time required to perform IV cannulation in the final encounter was significantly different between the VM+VF group vs VM alone group (126 [93-226] sec vs 345 [131-537] sec, respectively; median difference, 111 sec; 95% confidence interval, 8 to 391; P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in IV cannulation success between VM alone and VM+VF in the final encounter (75% vs 85% respectively; P = 0.65). For the VM+VF group, the time to perform IV cannulation was reduced after the final encounter compared with the baseline encounter (P = 0.002), which was not true of the VM alone group (P = 0.35).

conclusionVideo modeling and feedback shortened time to IV skill completion, reduced complications, and improved satisfaction in novice medical students.

Indexed as

Catheterization, PeripheralStudents, MedicalClinical CompetenceFeedbackHumansVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID32052372
OpenAlexW3006078558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.