Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32052329›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Plastic abundance and seasonal variation on the shorelines of three volcanic lakes in Central Italy: can amphipods help detect contamination?

Valentina Iannilli, Fabiana Corami, Patrizia Grasso, Francesca Lecce, Memmo Buttinelli, Andrea Setini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Valentina IannilliDepartment for Sustainability, ENEA, C.R. Casaccia via Anguillarese, 301 00123, Rome, Italy. valentina.iannilli@enea.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4970-1823
Fabiana CoramiCNR ISP Institute of Polar Sciences, National Research Council, Via Torino, 155 30172, Mestre Venezia, Italy.
Patrizia GrassoDepartment for Sustainability, ENEA, C.R. Casaccia via Anguillarese, 301 00123, Rome, Italy.
Francesca LecceDepartment for Sustainability, ENEA, C.R. Casaccia via Anguillarese, 301 00123, Rome, Italy.
Memmo ButtinelliDepartement for Biology and Biotecnology C. Darwin, University of Rome Sapienza, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5, 00185, Rome, RM, Italy.
Andrea SetiniDepartement for Biology and Biotecnology C. Darwin, University of Rome Sapienza, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5, 00185, Rome, RM, Italy.
National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITNational Research Council · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the exponential increase of studies on plastic debris in recent years, there are still few works focusing on the problem as it relates to inland waters: little is known about the accumulation and dispersion dynamics on lake shores, and there are no standardized sampling methods for monitoring purposes. The accumulation of plastic litter in natural habitats also threatens the resident organisms. In this paper, we investigated the abundance and accumulation of plastic particles, ranging in size from 1 to 50 mm, from the beach sediment of three volcanic lakes in Central Italy: Albano, Bracciano, and Vico. The collection was designed to define the most important variables that one must consider in order to obtain a representative sample of plastic litter in a lake environment. In view of the high heterogeneity of sampling protocols used, comparison among the obtained results is limited and sometimes impossible. By using one of the proposed sampling methodologies, and critically analyzing the results, we aimed to highlight a possible monitoring criterion and to identify specific elements that can be meaningful and representative. The samples were collected in May and September 2017. For each lake, we sampled plastic items and sediments from two beaches. Albano contained the largest amount of plastic (in weight), while Bracciano had the largest number of particles. Our observations lead us to infer that the number of particles is the parameter most sensitive to environmental variations, as well as the more suitable for monitoring with greater definition the differences between sites. Moreover, sampling should be taken in different seasons, following a sampling pattern that includes at least two beaches placed in strategic positions with respect to wind and waves.In order to identify new indicators to evaluate the entry points of plastic into the food web, we collected, from the same sites analyzed, some specimens of the Talitrid Amphipod Cryptorchestia garbinii, a detritivorous species having a critical role in debris turnover of these environments. To investigate the microplastic (MP) ingestion in natural conditions, we analyzed their digestive tracts with both Nile red staining method and micro-FTIR spectroscopy. The analyses confirmed that C. garbinii was able to ingest plastics in natural conditions. Therefore, it can signify one of the entry points for microplastics (MPs) in the trophic chain. This observation constitutes the first evidence of MP ingestion in this species.

Indexed as

AmphipodaAnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringItalyLakesPlasticsSeasonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalPlasticsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAlbanoBraccianoCryptorchestia garbiniiMicro-FTIRMicroplasticsMicroplastic trophic transferNile redPlastic pollutionSampling methodsVico

Identifiers

PMID32052329
OpenAlexW3006314356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.