Observational studyNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2020
Chronic migraine long-term regular treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA: a retrospective real-life observational study up to 4 years of therapy.
Observational study in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine: A meta-analysis on 10 years of real-world data.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2022Pooled it
- Botulinum toxin for chronic migraine.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Comparing Phase III Research Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy (PREEMPT) and Targeted Approaches for OnabotulinumtoxinA in Chronic Migraine Treatment.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Observational
- Insights from 25 years of onabotulinumtoxinA in migraine - mechanisms and management.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2024Review
- Long-term safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment in chronic migraine patients: a five-year retrospective study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- The effectiveness and predictors influencing the outcome of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in chronic migraine: understanding from diverse patient profiles in a single session.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Observational
- Review
- Article
- A Qualitative Study to Explore Patient Perspectives of Prophylactic Treatment with OnabotulinumtoxinA for Chronic Migraine.Pain and therapy · 2021Article
- Image-guided botulinum toxin injection in the lateral abdominal wall prior to abdominal wall reconstruction surgery: review of techniques and results.Skeletal radiology · 2021Review
- Delay in OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment During the COVID-19 Pandemic-Perspectives from a Virus Hotspot.Headache · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) was proved effective and safe in chronic migraine (CM) prevention by the Phase III Research Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis (PREEMPT) and Phase IV Chronic migraine OnabotulinuMtoxinA Prolonged Efficacy open-Label (COMPEL) trials over 1 and 2 years of treatment, respectively. Real-life studies highlighted BoNT-A sustained benefits up to 3 years of administration. Aim of this retrospective real-life study was observing within a 4-year timeframe the progress of a consecutive series of CM patients treated with BoNT-A and evaluating whether long-term quarterly treatment (up to 16 cycles) confirms the outcomes of previous studies over shorter periods of therapy.
methodsOne hundred nine chronic migraineurs were quarterly treated with BoNT-A according to the PREEMPT paradigm. Headache days and hours, analgesics intake and latency time together with disability were analysed at baseline, thereafter bi-annually up to 48 months. Patient responsiveness (improvement in monthly headache days and hours versus baseline) was computed at each study timepoint.
resultsA significant overall decrease from baseline to the 48-month assessment (p < 0.001) was evidenced for the mean number of monthly headache days and hours, analgesics intake and latency time. Severe disability cases significantly decreased at 6 months (p < 0.001), and a progressive shift towards lower degrees of disability was observed at each subsequent timepoint. A gradual percentage increase of responsive cases was observed as treatment was repeated over time. Transitory neck pain was reported in 6 cases.
conclusionsThis study appears to reconfirm the benefits of long-lasting CM prevention with BoNT-A, thus supporting quarterly treatment with BoNT-A over several year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.