Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32052262›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2021

Closing the Gap: Participatory Formative Evaluation to Reduce Cancer Screening Disparities among Patients with Limited English Proficiency.

Jennifer L Ridgeway, Jane W Njeru, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Ahmed A Mohamed, Onelis Quirindongo-Cedeño, Irene G Sia, Mark L Wieland

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Digital Storytelling Interventions to Promote Cancer Screening Among Hispanic/Latino Adults in Primary Care Settings.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennifer L RidgewayKern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7658-6763
Jane W NjeruDivision of Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Carmen Radecki BreitkopfDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ahmed A MohamedDivision of Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Onelis Quirindongo-CedeñoDivision of Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Irene G SiaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mark L WielandDivision of Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Wieland.Mark@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6166-3949

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) have disproportionately lower rates of cancer screening than English-proficient patients. Given the multifactorial nature of screening disparities, strategies to improve screening rates must address barriers within and outside of the clinic setting. The objectives of this study were to understand local barriers from multiple stakeholder perspectives, to identify potential multilevel intervention approaches, and to mobilize community-engaged intervention decision making and planning. This participatory formative evaluation approach employed needs assessment and user engagement in order to enhance intervention usefulness and relevance. The study took place in several stages and involved clinic and community partners in a small metropolitan area of the Midwest USA. Interviews were conducted with LEP patients (n = 9) who had not completed three recommended screenings (breast, cervical, and colorectal), primary care providers (n = 5), medical interpreter (n = 5), and community members (n = 3). These highlighted multilevel barriers including limited patient understanding of preventive health, time and cost constraints, and variable roles of language interpreters. The literature was also reviewed to identify interventions used with similar populations. Findings from this review suggest that interventions are largely focused on single population groups or address single screening barriers. Finally, a community-academic summit (n = 48 participants) was held to review results and develop recommendations for community and clinic interventions. Findings from this study indicate that it is possible to engage a diverse group of stakeholders in strategies that are responsive to health care providers and patients, including LEP patients from heterogeneous backgrounds.

Indexed as

Limited English ProficiencyNeoplasmsCommunication BarriersEarly Detection of CancerHumansLanguageCancer screeningCommunity-based participatory researchLimited English proficiency

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.