Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32052261›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2021

Radiation Oncology Training in Poland: Multi-institutional Survey.

Aleksandra Napieralska, Bartłomiej Tomasik, Mateusz Spałek, Artur Chyrek, Jacek Fijuth

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Making Radiation Oncology specialty more attractive to young medical graduates: pulling back the invisibility curtain.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A new perspective on the future of Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology: Young Radiation Oncologists Group (TROD/GROG 001).Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Being a young radiation oncologist in Poland: results of a multi-institutional survey.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  9. National societies' needs as assessed by the ESTRO National Societies Committee survey: A European perspective.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aleksandra NapieralskaRadiotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Cancer Centre, ul. Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 15, 44-101, Gliwice, Poland. olanapieralska@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7390-9165
Bartłomiej TomasikDepartment of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Mateusz SpałekDepartment of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Institute - Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland.
Artur ChyrekBrachytherapy Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznań, Poland.
Jacek FijuthDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the quality of radiation oncology training in Poland and to identify difficulties and needs of radiation oncology trainees (ROTs), an anonymous online survey using Google Forms was conducted in November 2018. All ROTs from Poland (n = 154) were invited to complete the survey. The survey consisted of 30 questions and regarded aspects such as satisfaction from training, cooperation with the supervisor, and education. During the study period, 105 ROTs from 22 Polish cities responded (the response rate was 68%). Almost 85% were satisfied with the choice of specialty, 43% with training and 81% with the teaching place. Clinical cooperation with the supervisor was described as difficult by 25%. With education, 38% of responders experienced obstacles and another 25% stated that educational cooperation with their supervisor was none. "Good practice" understood as treatment according to the latest guidelines or internal protocols were reported by 71%. Obligatory traineeships were shorter than recommended according to 67% of the responders, usually due to shortage of medical staff. Almost two-thirds of ROTs work only in clinics, while 34% perform both clinical and scientific work. The responders suggested that the introduction of organ-specified courses is an appropriate modification of the current program. Noteworthy, current diagnostic imaging and physics courses are not sufficient for the majority of participants (81% and 80%, respectively). Radiation oncology training is conducted relatively well in Poland. Some hospitals need to improve clinical and educational cooperation between trainees and their supervisors.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyMedicineRadiation OncologyHumansPolandSurveys and QuestionnairesEducationRadiation oncologyResidentsTraining quality

Identifiers

PMID32052261
PMCPMC8328852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.