ReviewAnnals of intensive care2020
Dosing vitamin C in critically ill patients with special attention to renal replacement therapy: a narrative review.
Review in Annals of intensive care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical benefits and risks of high-dose intravenous vitamin C: a systematic review.Journal of medicine and life · 2026Pooled it
- Harnessing Vitamin C: Unveiling Its Potential in Cancer Prevention and Treatment.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Nutrition support for patients with renal dysfunction in the intensive care unit: A narrative review.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025Review
- Nutritional management of children with acute kidney injury-clinical practice recommendations from the Pediatric Renal Nutrition Taskforce.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2023Review
- Dietary magnesium is able to influence the relationship between vitamin C and estimated glomerular filtration rate: A cross-sectional study.Food science & nutrition · 2023Article
- Metabolic and nutritional aspects in continuous renal replacement therapy.Journal of intensive medicine · 2023Review
- Vitamin C supplementation and paraoxonase 1 activity in patients on hemodialysis: a meta-analysis.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2023Article
- Up to 100 g of Intravenous Vitamin C Appears to be Safe and Elicits No Adverse Effects but Needs Further Evaluation in High-Risk Groups.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2022Article
- Vitamin C Intervention for Critical COVID-19: A Pragmatic Review of the Current Level of Evidence.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Reduced Plasma Ascorbate and Increased Proportion of Dehydroascorbic Acid Levels in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Understanding the Therapeutic Potential of Ascorbic Acid in the Battle to Overcome Cancer.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Wogonin alleviates liver injury in sepsis through Nrf2-mediated NF-κB signalling suppression.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021Article
- Plasma Vitamin C and Risk of Late Graft Failure in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results of the TransplantLines Biobank and Cohort Study.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Response to the letter of Morán et al. regarding our use of an inaccurate reference for the maximal dose of vitamin C in G6PD deficiency.Annals of intensive care · 2020Article
- Commentary to "Dosing vitamin C in critically ill patients with special attention to renal replacement therapy: a narrative review".Annals of intensive care · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RATIONALE/
methodsThe primary aim of the present contribution is to find a literature-based agreement on dose adjustments of vitamin C in critically ill patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT). AVAILABLE DATA/STUDY
resultsCritical illness is frequently accompanied by severe vitamin C deficiency. High-dose supplementation beneficially affects clinical outcome in small cohorts of patients with sepsis, burn injury, and trauma. There are no specific data on clinical outcomes in patients receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT). Vitamin C plasma concentrations in patients on RRT are comparable to critically ill patients not receiving RRT. Vitamin C is cleared from the circulation during RRT at a rate dependent on the plasma concentration, dose and duration of RRT. Sieving coefficient is about 1. While the dose of RRT is lower than normal renal function, tubular reabsorption is absent. Sparse evidence suggests that vitamin C dosing during continuous RRT should not exceed the dose administered to critically ill patients not receiving continuous RRT. Low plasma concentrations are expected during prolonged RRT because of persistent extracorporeal removal, absent renal reabsorption and enhanced metabolic loss due to circuit-induced oxidative stress. A dosage of twice 1 g vitamin C daily may be necessary to achieve normal plasma concentrations during RRT, but more studies are needed. There is no available evidence that high doses of vitamin C administered over a short period can induce oxalate stones or has pro-oxidant effects.
conclusionsSupplementing vitamin C 1 g twice daily to critically ill patients has a solid pathophysiological rationale and a good safety profile. Patients on RRT probably need similar doses as critically ill patients not receiving RRT. Intravenous vitamin C in a dose of 2 g/day may be necessary to achieve normal plasma concentrations during RRT. However, data on dose adjustment of vitamin C during intermittent or chronic RRT are sparse and require more thorough pharmacokinetic and dose-response studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.