Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32052221›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue banking2020

Serological testing for infectious diseases markers of donor specimens from 24 h after death show no significant change in outcomes from other specimens.

Chee Choy Kok, Vidiya Ramachandran, Ece Egilmezer, Sanghamitra Ray, Gregory J Walker, William D Rawlinson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Suitability of Different Diagnostic Platforms for Virological Testing of Blood Samples from Cornea Donors.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chee Choy KokSerology and Virology Division, New South Wales Health Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.
Vidiya RamachandranSerology and Virology Division, New South Wales Health Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.
Ece EgilmezerVirology Research Laboratory, Serology and Virology Division, Prince of Wales Hospital, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.
Sanghamitra RaySerology and Virology Division, New South Wales Health Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.
Gregory J WalkerVirology Research Laboratory, Serology and Virology Division, Prince of Wales Hospital, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.
William D RawlinsonSerology and Virology Division, New South Wales Health Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia. w.rawlinson@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0988-7827
Prince of Wales Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing demand for organ and tissue donations to cater for a growing waiting list of recipients. Serological screening of donors remains the initial assessment upon which many decisions are made, particularly if donors are found to be seropositive. Multiple different platforms are now available, although the Abbott ARCHITECT platform assays are currently licensed globally for testing of blood collected at less than 15 h post-mortem. Compliance with the specified maximum collection times drastically decreases the number of eligible deceased donors, with ~ 70% more donations available if screened at up to 24 h post mortem. A large scale study on deceased donors was performed where blood was collected between 12 and 25 h post-mortem. A total of 194 cadaveric serological specimens were tested using the Abbott ARCHITECT analyser for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Human T Lymphotropic Virus type I/II, and syphilis infection. The specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, reproducibility and influence of storage conditions were assessed for testing with Abbott ARCHITECT platform for HIV antigen/antibody Combo, HCV antibody, HBV surface antigen (HBsAg), HBV core antibody (HBcAb), HTLVI/II antibody (rHTLV-I/II), and Syphilis TP assays. There was no significant difference between testing of sera from living and cadaveric individuals in terms of assay specificity, sensitivity and accuracy. The findings show testing of human serum and plasma specimens collected up to 24 h post-mortem with these assays is acceptable and reflects host status accurately.

Indexed as

Blood Specimen CollectionTissue DonorsBiomarkersCommunicable DiseasesHumansPreservation, BiologicalReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsBiomarkersPost-mortemSerologyTissue donorValidation

Identifiers

PMID32052221
OpenAlexW3006494981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.