Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32052187›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2020

[Health-related outcomes in shared-housing arrangements-results of a rapid review].

Susanne Stiefler, Kathrin Seibert, Karin Wolf-Ostermann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susanne StieflerInstitut für Public Health und Pflegeforschung, Abteilung 7: Pflegewissenschaftliche Versorgungsforschung, Universität Bremen, Grazer Straße 4, 28359, Bremen, Deutschland.
Kathrin SeibertInstitut für Public Health und Pflegeforschung, Abteilung 7: Pflegewissenschaftliche Versorgungsforschung, Universität Bremen, Grazer Straße 4, 28359, Bremen, Deutschland.
Karin Wolf-OstermannInstitut für Public Health und Pflegeforschung, Abteilung 7: Pflegewissenschaftliche Versorgungsforschung, Universität Bremen, Grazer Straße 4, 28359, Bremen, Deutschland. wolf-ostermann@uni-bremen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShared-housing arrangements are relevant as a possible living arrangement alternative to living in a nursing home or residing in their own home for people in need of care. The aim was to record demonstrable differences in health-related outcomes between residents of shared-housing arrangements and residents of nursing homes. MATERIALS AND

methodsA rapid review was conducted to identify health-related outcomes in shared-housing arrangements. The literature search was carried out in September 2017 in the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Gerolit and LIVIVO. Comparative studies of German or English language were included when the nursing home was examined as a control group.

resultsThe majority of the 21 studies included describes a favorable contribution of shared-housing arrangements compared to nursing homes. Quality of life is a frequently examined outcome that provides evidence of an advantage of shared-housing arrangements, especially for persons with dementia.

conclusionA variety of health-related outcomes were examined. The results provide indications of favorable contributions of shared-housing arrangements. For the most part, there is still no conclusive evidence for outcomes based on studies of higher levels of evidence.

Indexed as

HousingDementiaHumansNursing HomesQuality of LifeEvidenceHousing for older peopleNursing homeOutcomeQuality of care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.