ArticleJournal of neurology2020
Prognostic role of slow vital capacity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- At-Home Versus in-Clinic Vital Capacity Measurement: Insights From the HEALEY ALS Platform Trial.Muscle & nerve · 2026Article
- Phosphatemia is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Annals of neurology · 2025Article
- Use of the combination of spirometry, arterial blood gas analysis and overnight oximetry to predict the outcomes of patients affected by motor neuron disease: The Milan-Torin respiratory score (Mi-To-RS).European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Update on recent advances in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Airway Clearance Strategies and Secretion Management in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Respiratory care · 2024Review
- Fluid biomarkers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a review.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2024Review
- Practical Guide to Management of Long-Term Noninvasive Ventilation for Adults With Chronic Neuromuscular Disease.Respiratory care · 2023Review
- Iranian clinical practice guideline for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Considerations for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Clinical Trial Design.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022Review
- Comparison of Slow and Forced Vital Capacity on Ability to Evaluate Respiratory Function in Bulbar-Involved Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Using patient-reported symptoms of dyspnea for screening reduced respiratory function in patients with motor neuron diseases.Journal of neurology · 2020Article
- Diaphragmatic CMAP amplitude from phrenic nerve stimulation predicts functional decline in ALS.Journal of neurology · 2020Article
- Real-world evidence of riluzole on survival and ALSFRS change in a Chinese ALS cohort.Neurodegenerative disease managementArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the prognostic role of FVC and SVC at diagnosis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients.
methodsWe included all patients from the Piemonte and Valle D'Aosta ALS register (PARALS) who had been diagnosed with ALS between 1995 and 2015 and underwent spirometry at diagnosis. Survival was considered as time to death/tracheostomy; to assess the prognostic value in typical trial timeframes, survival at 12 and 18 months was calculated too. Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusted by sex, age at diagnosis, diagnostic delay, onset site, and ALSFRS-R total score at the moment of diagnosis were used to assess the prognostic role of FVC and SVC.
resultsA total of 795 ALS patients underwent spirometry at diagnosis during the study period. Four hundred and sixteen (52.3%) performed both FVC and SVC, whereas the others performed FVC only. FVC and SVC values were highly correlated (r = 0.92, p < 0.001) in the overall population and slightly less correlated in patients with bulbar onset (r = 0.86, p < 0.001). Both FVC and SVC proved to have a prognostic role with comparable hazard ratios (HRs) (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.48-2.27 and 1.88, 95% CI 1.51-2.33, respectively). When considering typical trial timeframes, HRs remained similar and were inversely proportional to FVC and SVC values. DISCUSSION: FVC and SVC at diagnosis can be used interchangeably as independent predictors of survival in both clinical and research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.