Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32052147›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of nutrition2020

Combined effect of interventions with pure or enriched mixtures of (poly)phenols and anti-diabetic medication in type 2 diabetes management: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled human trials.

Ana F Raimundo, Filipa Félix, Rita Andrade, María-Teresa García-Conesa, Antonio González-Sarrías, João Gilsa-Lopes, Dulce do Ó, Ana Raimundo, Rogério Ribeiro, Ana Rodriguez-Mateos and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of a Chokeberry (Nutrients · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Efficacy and Safety ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Ana F RaimundoiBET, Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica, Apartado 12, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal.
Filipa FélixiBET, Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica, Apartado 12, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal.
Rita AndradeAPDP, Associação Protectora Dos Diabéticos de Portugal, Lisbon, Portugal.
María-Teresa García-ConesaResearch Group On Quality, Safety and Bioactivity of Plant Foods, Department of Food Science and Technology, CEBAS-CSIC, Murcia, Spain.
Antonio González-SarríasResearch Group On Quality, Safety and Bioactivity of Plant Foods, Department of Food Science and Technology, CEBAS-CSIC, Murcia, Spain.
João Gilsa-LopesCEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Centre, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campo dos Mártires da Pátria, 130, 1169-056, Lisbon, Portugal.
Dulce do ÓAPDP, Associação Protectora Dos Diabéticos de Portugal, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana RaimundoAPDP, Associação Protectora Dos Diabéticos de Portugal, Lisbon, Portugal.
Rogério RibeiroCEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Centre, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campo dos Mártires da Pátria, 130, 1169-056, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana Rodriguez-MateosDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Cláudia N SantosiBET, Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica, Apartado 12, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal.
Manuel SchärDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, School of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Ana SilvaInstituto Politécnico de Santarém, Escola Superior Agrária, S. Pedro, 2001-904, Santarém, Portugal.
Inês CruzInstituto Politécnico de Santarém, Escola Superior Agrária, S. Pedro, 2001-904, Santarém, Portugal.
Brian WangDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Paula PintoInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Av. da República, 2780-157, Oeiras, Portugal. paula.pinto@esa.ipsantarem.pt.
Regina MenezesiBET, Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica, Apartado 12, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal. rmenezes@ibet.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0552-8480
Associacao Protectora dos Diabeticos de Portugal · PTCentro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura · ESInstituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica · PTInstituto Politécnico de Santarém · PTKing's College London · GBLife Quality Research Centre · PTUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversity of Lisbon · PTUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

EU FA1403Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia iNOVA4Health - UID/Multi/04462/2019Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PD/BD/135504/2018Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PTDC/BIA-MOL31104/2017Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BPD/110426/2015Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/Multi/04462/2013-SubProj iNOVA4Health 44Sociedade Portuguesa de Diabetologia Nuno Castelo-Branco Prize - 2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose(Poly)phenols have been reported to confer protective effects against type 2 diabetes but the precise association remains elusive. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of (poly)phenol intake on well-established biomarkers in people with type 2 diabetes or at risk of developing diabetes.

methodsA systematic search was conducted using the following selection criteria: (1) human randomized controlled trials involving individuals with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes; (2) one or more of the following biomarkers: glucose, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), insulin, pro-insulin, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP)/amylin, pro-IAPP/pro-amylin, glucagon, C-peptide; (3) chronic intervention with pure or enriched mixtures of (poly)phenols. From 488 references, 88 were assessed for eligibility; data were extracted from 27 studies and 20 were used for meta-analysis. The groups included in the meta-analysis were: (poly)phenol mixtures, isoflavones, flavanols, anthocyanins and resveratrol.

resultsEstimated intervention/control mean differences evidenced that, overall, the consumption of (poly)phenols contributed to reduced fasting glucose levels (- 3.32 mg/dL; 95% CI - 5.86, - 0.77; P = 0.011). Hb1Ac was only slightly reduced (- 0.24%; 95% CI - 0.43, - 0.044; P = 0.016) whereas the levels of insulin and HOMA-IR were not altered. Subgroup comparative analyses indicated a stronger effect on blood glucose in individuals with diabetes (- 5.86 mg/dL, 95% CI - 11.34, - 0.39; P = 0.036) and this effect was even stronger in individuals taking anti-diabetic medication (- 10.17 mg/dL, 95% CI - 16.59, - 3.75; P = 0.002).

conclusionsOur results support that the consumption of (poly)phenols may contribute to lower glucose levels in individuals with type 2 diabetes or at risk of diabetes and that these compounds may also act in combination with anti-diabetic drugs.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCombined Modality TherapyDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansHypoglycemic AgentsPhenolsPolyphenolsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiomarkersHypoglycemic AgentsPhenolsPolyphenolsAntidiabetic therapyDiabetesGlucoseHb1AcInsulinPolyphenol

Identifiers

PMID32052147
OpenAlexW3005871162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.