Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32052124›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2020

Urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio to differentiate type 2 diabetes mellitus from type 1 in pediatric patients.

Wafaa Elzahar, Ahmed Arafa, Amira Youssef, Adel Erfan, Doaa El Amrousy

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Random C-Peptide and Islet Antibodies at Onset Predict β Cell Function Trajectory and Insulin Dependence in Pediatric Diabetes.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2024
    Article
  3. UrinaryNutrients · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wafaa ElzaharPediatric Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University Hospital, El motasem street No 6, Tanta, Egypt.
Ahmed ArafaPediatric Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University Hospital, El motasem street No 6, Tanta, Egypt.
Amira YoussefClinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta, Egypt.
Adel ErfanPediatric Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University Hospital, El motasem street No 6, Tanta, Egypt.
Doaa El AmrousyPediatric Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University Hospital, El motasem street No 6, Tanta, Egypt. doaamoha@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7836-1170
Tanta University Hospital · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is frequently misdiagnosed in children and treated as type 1 DM (T1DM) with insulin. Urinary C-peptide to creatinine ratio (UCPCR) can be used to measure ß cell function and endogenous insulin. We aimed to assess the value of UCPCR to differentiate T2DM from T1DM in pediatric patients. We assessed UCPCR from urine sample taken 2 h after lunch in 50 children with T1DM and 30 children with T2DM (duration of the disease ≥ 2 years and without renal impairment). Fasting and postprandial C-peptide levels were also evaluated in all included children. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to assess the optimal UCPCR cutoff level to differentiate T2DM from T1DM in children. UCPCR was significantly lower in children with T1DM compared with those with T2DM (P < 0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between UCPCR and fasting C-peptide, postprandial C-peptide, and age of onset. There was a significant negative correlation between the UCPCR and both HbA1c and duration of DM in T1DM. Fasting C-peptide had a sensitivity of 63%, a specificity of 84% at a cutoff point ≥ 1.3 ng/ml to differentiate T2DM from T1DM. Postprandial C-peptide had a sensitivity of 87%, a specificity of 86% at a cutoff point ≥ 3.2 ng/ml to differentiate T2DM from T1DM. Finally, UCPCR had a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 88% at a cutoff point ≥ 0.28 nmol/nmol to differentiate T2DM from T1DM in pediatric patients.Conclusion: UCPCR is an easy noninvasive reliable marker to differentiate T2DM from T1DM in pediatric patients.What is Known:• Type 2 DM (T2DM) is frequently misdiagnosed in children and treated as type 1 DM (T1DM) with insulin.• Urinary C-peptide to creatinine ratio (UCPCR) can be used to measure ß cell function and endogenous insulin.What is New:• We revealed that UCPCR had a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 88% at a cutoff point ≥ 0.28 nmol/nmol to differentiate T2DM from T1DM.• UCPCR is an easy noninvasive dependable marker to diagnose T2DM from T1DM in pediatric patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesChildC-PeptideCreatinineDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersC-PeptideCreatinineChildrenT1DMT2DMUCPCR

Identifiers

PMID32052124
OpenAlexW3005713518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.