ReviewDer Radiologe2020
[Theranostics and hybrid imaging for somatostatin receptor-expressing tumors].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in the follow up of neuroendocrine neoplasms of appendix.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical/methodical issueConventional imaging tests like computed tomography (CT) cannot visualize somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression on the tumor cell surface. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
methodsFor imaging of SSTR-expressing tumors conventional morphological imaging tests such as CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are employed. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Molecular imaging of SSTR expression on the tumor cell surface, in particular by using (whole body) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET), are considered the current standard of care. Only the use of CT enables for exact localization of putative sites of disease (hybrid imaging). PERFORMANCE: Hybrid SPECT/CT and PET/CT are of utmost importance for staging and monitoring of treatment efficacy. SSTR-PET is superior to SPECT and the PET radiotracer ACHIEVEMENTS: A combined use of conventional and functional imaging tests is superior to conventional imaging alone and allows for identification of suitable candidates for a theranostic approach. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: In case of clinical suspicion or after having obtained histological evidence, hybrid SSTR-SPECT/CT or -PET/CT should be performed, preferably in a dedicated molecular imaging center.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.