Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32052114›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2020

[Artificial intelligence in hybrid imaging].

Christian Strack, Robert Seifert, Jens Kleesiek

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christian StrackAG Computational Radiology, Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Robert SeifertDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Deutschland.
Jens KleesiekAG Computational Radiology, Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Deutschland. j.kleesiek@dkfz-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical issueHybrid imaging enables the precise visualization of cellular metabolism by combining anatomical and metabolic information. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer new methods for processing and evaluating this data. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: This review summarizes current developments and applications of AI methods in hybrid imaging. Applications in image processing as well as methods for disease-related evaluation are presented and discussed. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis article is based on a selective literature search with the search engines PubMed and arXiv. ASSESSMENT: Currently, there are only a few AI applications using hybrid imaging data and no applications are established in clinical routine yet. Although the first promising approaches are emerging, they still need to be evaluated prospectively. In the future, AI applications will support radiologists and nuclear medicine radiologists in diagnosis and therapy.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMultimodal ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedCellular metabolismDeep learningDeep neuronal networksDiagnostic imagingMachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.