Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32052105›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2020

Report of a Quality Improvement Program for Reducing Postoperative Complications by Using a Surgical Risk Calculator in a Cohort of General Surgery Patients.

Elisa M Müller, Eva Herrmann, Thomas Schmandra, Thomas F Weigel, Ernst Hanisch, Alexander Buia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elisa M MüllerDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Asklepios Klinik Langen, Academic Teaching Hospital Goethe-University Frankfurt, Röntgenstraße 20, 63225, Langen, Deutschland, Germany.
Eva HerrmannDepartment of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modeling, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Thomas SchmandraDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Rhön Klinik Bad Neustadt a. d. Saale, Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany.
Thomas F WeigelDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Heilig-Geist-Hospital Bingen, Bingen am Rhein, Germany.
Ernst HanischDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Asklepios Klinik Langen, Academic Teaching Hospital Goethe-University Frankfurt, Röntgenstraße 20, 63225, Langen, Deutschland, Germany.
Alexander BuiaDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Asklepios Klinik Langen, Academic Teaching Hospital Goethe-University Frankfurt, Röntgenstraße 20, 63225, Langen, Deutschland, Germany. a.buia@asklepios.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8090-5453
Goethe University Frankfurt · DERhön-Klinikum · DETH Bingen University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study investigates whether postoperative complications in elective surgery can be reduced by using a risk calculator via raising the awareness of the surgeon in a preoperative briefing. Postoperative complications like wound infections or pneumonia result in a high burden for healthcare systems. Multiple quality improvement programs address this problem like the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator

methodsTo determine whether the preoperative usage of the SRC could reduce inpatient postoperative complications, two groups of 832 patients each were compared using propensity score matching. The SRC was employed retrospectively in the period 2012/2013 in one group ("Retro") and prospectively in the other group ("Prosp") in the period 2014/2015. Actual inpatient postoperative complications were classified by SRC complication categories and compared with the Clavien-Dindo complication classification system (Dindo et al. in Ann Surg 240:205-213, 2004).

resultsComparing SRC "serious complication" and SRC "any complication," a nonsignificant increase in the "Prosp"-group was apparent (serious complication: 6.6% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.164; any complication: 8.5% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.444).

conclusionUse of the SRC neither reduces inpatient postoperative complications nor the severity of complications. The calculations of the SRC rely on a 30-day postoperative follow-up. Poor sensitivity and medium specificity of the SRC showed that the SRC could not make accurate predictions in a short follow-up time averaging 6 days. Alternatively, since the observed complication rate was low in our study, in an environment of already highly implemented risk management tools, reductions in complications are not easily achieved.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlastic Surgery ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID32052105
OpenAlexW3005868625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.