Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32052088›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2020

Dynamics of kinetochore structure and its regulations during mitotic progression.

Masatoshi Hara, Tatsuo Fukagawa

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The enigma of the B chromosome-specific behaviour.Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Loss-Function ofSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masatoshi HaraGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan. mahara@fbs.osaka-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8433-1111
Tatsuo FukagawaGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan. tfukagawa@fbs.osaka-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8564-6852
Ube Frontier University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 15H05972Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 17H06167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Faithful chromosome segregation during mitosis in eukaryotes requires attachment of the kinetochore, a large protein complex assembled on the centromere of each chromosome, to the spindle microtubules. The kinetochore is a structural interface for the microtubule attachment and provides molecular surveillance mechanisms that monitor and ensure the precise microtubule attachment as well, including error correction and spindle assembly checkpoint. During mitotic progression, the kinetochore undergoes dynamic morphological changes that are observable through electron microscopy as well as through fluorescence microscopy. These structural changes might be associated with the kinetochore function. In this review, we summarize how the dynamics of kinetochore morphology are associated with its functions and discuss recent findings on the switching of protein interaction networks in the kinetochore during cell cycle progression.

Indexed as

MitosisCell Cycle ProteinsCentromereCentromere Protein AChromosome SegregationHumansKinetochoresMicrotubulesProtein Interaction MapsCell Cycle ProteinsCentromere Protein ACell cycleCentromereKinetochoreMitosisPhosphorylationProtein-protein interaction

Identifiers

PMID32052088
PMCPMC11104943
OpenAlexW3005802382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.