Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32052081›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2020

Accuracy of colonic mucosal patterns at contrast enema for diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease.

Sucari S C Vlok, Sam W Moore, Pawel T Schubert, Richard D Pitcher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sucari S C VlokDivision of Radiodiagnosis, Department of Medical Imaging and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. sucarivlok@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6579-971X
Sam W MooreDivision of Paediatric Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Pawel T SchubertDivision of Anatomical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Richard D PitcherDivision of Radiodiagnosis, Department of Medical Imaging and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Stellenbosch University · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious patterns of colonic mucosal irregularity have been recorded on contrast enema, each with individually very low sensitivity, but high specificity.

objectiveTo assess the accuracy of the radiologic features of Hirschsprung disease utilising a unifying stratification of any form of colonic mucosal irregularity on contrast enema. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of children with suspected Hirschsprung disease managed at a tertiary South African hospital from January 2009 through April 2015. Three observers independently reviewed abdominal radiographs and contrast enemas. The enema analysis included a unifying category of any form of colonic mucosal irregularity. Radiologic features were compared with rectal biopsy results. We used descriptive statistics and the Fisher exact test to compare the radiologic features of children with and without Hirschsprung disease.

resultsNinety-two children with median age of 37 days (range 3 days to 11 years) were included; 50 had biopsy-proven Hirschsprung disease. On enema, any mucosal irregularity, a transition zone and recto-sigmoid ratio inversion were associated with Hirschsprung disease (all P<0.01). Mucosal irregularity showed 96% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.3-99.5) and 71.4% specificity (CI 55.4-84.3); a transition zone showed 86% sensitivity (CI 73.3-94.2) and 90.5% specificity (CI 77.4-97.3); and recto-sigmoid ratio inversion showed 78% sensitivity (CI 64.0-88.5) and 83.3% specificity (CI 68.3-93.0).

conclusionColonic mucosal irregularity on contrast enema has high sensitivity and moderate specificity for Hirschsprung disease.

Indexed as

EnemaBiopsyChildChild, PreschoolColonic DiseasesContrast MediaFemaleHirschsprung DiseaseHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySouth AfricaContrast MediaChildrenColonHirschsprung diseaseMucosal irregularityNeonatesRadiographic contrast enemaRadiologic findings

Identifiers

PMID32052081
OpenAlexW3006117476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.