Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32051814›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2020

What are the most important predictive factors for clinically relevant posthepatectomy liver failure after right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma?

Jonathan Geograpo Navarro, Seok Jeong Yang, Incheon Kang, Gi Hong Choi, Dai Hoon Han, Kyung Sik Kim, Jin Sub Choi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pre-TIPS Liver and Spleen Volumetry Are Not Associated With Liver-Related Outcomes After TIPS Placement for Refractory Ascites.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jonathan Geograpo NavarroDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seok Jeong YangDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Incheon KangDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Gi Hong ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7511-9581
Dai Hoon HanDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyung Sik KimDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jin Sub ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe risk of posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) after right hepatectomy remains substantial. Additional parameters such as computed tomography volumetry, liver stiffness measurement by FibroScan, indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes, and platelet count used to properly assess future liver remnant volume quality and quantity are of the utmost importance. Thus, we compared the usefulness of these modalities for predicting PHLF among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after right hepatectomy.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma between 2007 and 2013. PHLF was determined according to International Study Group of Liver Surgery consensus definition and severity grading. Grades B and C were defined as clinically relevant posthepatectomy liver failure (CRPHLF). The results were internally validated using a cohort of 97 patients.

resultsAmong the 90 included patients, 15 (16.7%) had CRPHLF. Multivariate analysis confirmed that platelet count < 140 (10

conclusionRLV/BW ratio and platelet count are more important than the conventional RLV/TFLV, indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes, and liver stiffness measurement in the preoperative risk assessment for CRPHLF.

Indexed as

HepatectomyHepatocellular carcinomaLiver failure

Identifiers

PMID32051814
PMCPMC7002877
OpenAlexW3005414209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.