Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32051791›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the ... International Conference on Auditory Display. International Conference on Auditory Display2019

DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF AN AUDIO GAME-INSPIRED AUDITORY MAP INTERFACE.

Brandon Biggs, James M Coughlan, Peter Coppin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Auditory Display. International Conference on Auditory Display, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Systematically Evaluating Digital Map Tools Based on the WCAG.Journal on technology and persons with disabilities : ... Annual International Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Non-Visual Access to an Interactive 3D Map.Computers helping people with special needs : ... International Conference, ICCHP ... : proceedings. International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs · 2022
    Article
  4. EVALUATION OF A NON-VISUAL AUDITORY CHOROPLETH AND TRAVEL MAP VIEWER.Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Auditory Display. International Conference on Auditory Display · 2022
    Article
  5. Getting in Touch With Tactile Map Automated Production: Evaluating impact and areas for improvement.Journal on technology and persons with disabilities : ... Annual International Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brandon BiggsOCAD University, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W1, Canada.
James M CoughlanSmith-Kettlewell Inst., San Francisco, CA, 94115, United States.
Peter CoppinOCAD University, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W1, Canada.

Funding

Leveraging Maps and Computer Vision to Support Indoor Navigation for Blind TravelersR01EY029033 · NEI · SMITH-KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI COUGHLAN, JAMES M · 2018 to 2021
$2.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated a web-based auditory map prototype built utilizing conventions found in audio games and presents findings from a set of tasks participants performed with the prototype. The prototype allowed participants to use their own computer and screen reader, contrary to most studies, which restrict use to a single platform and a self-voicing feature (providing a voice that talks by default). There were three major findings from the tasks: the interface was extremely easy to learn and navigate, participants all had unique navigational styles and preferred using their own screen reader, and participants needed user interface features that made it easier to understand and answer questions about spatial properties and relationships. Participants gave an average task load score of 39 from the NASA Task Load Index and gave a confidence level of 46/100 for actually using the prototype to physically navigate.

Identifiers

PMID32051791
PMCPMC7015068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.