Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32051552›Full record

ArticleActa pharmacologica Sinica2020

A comparative pharmacogenomic analysis of three classic TCM prescriptions for coronary heart disease based on molecular network modeling.

Ying-Ying Zhang, Zi-de Zhao, Peng-Yun Kong, Lin Gao, Ya-Nan Yu, Jun Liu, Peng-Qian Wang, Bing Li, Xiao-Xu Zhang, Li-Qiang Yang and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Therapeutic mechanism ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ying-Ying Zhang *Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China.
Zi-de Zhao *Eye Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100040, China.
Peng-Yun Kong *Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, 530200, China.
Lin GaoGuangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, 530200, China.
Ya-Nan YuInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Jun LiuInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Peng-Qian WangInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Bing LiInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Xiao-Xu ZhangEye Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100040, China.
Li-Qiang YangGuangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, 530200, China. ylq6606@163.com.
Zhong WangInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China. zhonw@vip.sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has evolved over several thousands of years, which has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of ischemic heart disease. Three classical TCM prescriptions, namely Xuefu Zhuyu Decoction, Zhishi Xiebai Guizhi Decoction, and Gualou Xiebai Banxia Decoction, have been extensively used in the treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD). Based on molecular network modeling, we performed a comparative pharmacogenomic analysis to systematically determine the drug-targeting spectrum of the three prescriptions at molecular level. Wide-area target molecules of CHD were covered, which was a common feature of the three decoctions, demonstrating their therapeutic functions. Meanwhile, collective signaling involved metabolic/pro-metabolic pathways, driving and transferring pathways, neuropsychiatric pathways, and exocrine or endocrine pathways. These organized pharmacological disturbance was mainly focused on almost all stages of CHD intervention, such as anti-atherosclerosis, lipid metabolism, inflammation, vascular wall function, foam cells formation, platelets aggregation, thrombosis, arrhythmia, and ischemia-reperfusion injury. In addition, heterogeneity analysis of the global pharmacological molecular spectrum revealed that signaling crosstalk, cascade convergence, and key targets were tendentious among the three decoctions. After all, it is unadvisable to rank the findings on targeting advantages of the three decoctions. Comparative pharmacological evidence may provide an appropriate decoction scheme for individualized intervention of CHD.

Indexed as

Pharmacogenomic TestingCoronary DiseaseDrugs, Chinese HerbalHumansMedicine, Chinese TraditionalModels, MolecularDrugs, Chinese Herbalgualou xiebai baijiutangguizhi decoctionXue-Fu-Zhu-Yu decoctionclassical TCM prescriptionscoronary heart diseaseGualou Xiebai Banxia Decoctionmolecular network modelingnetwork pharmacologyXuefu Zhuyu DecoctionZhishi Xiebai Guizhi Decoction

Identifiers

PMID32051552
PMCPMC7471444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.