Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32051326›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

The Contribution of AMPA and NMDA Receptors to Persistent Firing in the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Working Memory.

Bram van Vugt, Timo van Kerkoerle, Devavrat Vartak, Pieter R Roelfsema

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effects of Ketamine on Frontoparietal Interactions in a Rule-Based Antisaccade Task in Macaque Monkeys.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Regional brain gray matter volume in world-class artistic gymnasts.The journal of physiological sciences : JPS · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bram van VugtDepartment of Vision & Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, 1105 BA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Timo van KerkoerleCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives, Direction des Sciences du Vivant/Institut d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, NeuroSpin Center, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Devavrat VartakDepartment of Vision & Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, 1105 BA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pieter R RoelfsemaDepartment of Vision & Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, 1105 BA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, p.roelfsema@nin.knaw.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1625-0034
Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NLUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many tasks demand that information is kept online for a few seconds before it is used to guide behavior. The information is kept in working memory as the persistent firing of neurons encoding the memorized information. The neural mechanisms responsible for persistent activity are not yet well understood. Theories attribute an important role to ionotropic glutamate receptors, and it has been suggested that NMDARs are particularly important for persistent firing because they exhibit long time constants. Ionotropic AMPARs have shorter time constants and have been suggested to play a smaller role in working memory. Here we compared the contribution of AMPARs and NMDARs to persistent firing in the dlPFC of male macaque monkeys performing a delayed saccade to a memorized spatial location. We used iontophoresis to eject small amounts of glutamate receptor antagonists, aiming to perturb, but not abolish, neuronal activity. We found that both AMPARs and NMDARs contributed to persistent activity. Blockers of the NMDARs decreased persistent firing associated with the memory of the neuron's preferred spatial location but had comparatively little effect on the representation of the antipreferred location. They therefore decreased the information conveyed by persistent firing about the memorized location. In contrast, AMPAR blockers decreased activity elicited by the memory of both the preferred and antipreferred location, with a smaller effect on the information conveyed by persistent activity. Our results provide new insights into the contribution of AMPARs and NMDARs to persistent activity during working memory tasks.

Indexed as

6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dioneAnimalsElectrophysiological PhenomenaExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsIontophoresisMacaca mulattaMaleMemory, Short-TermNeuronsPrefrontal CortexPsychomotor PerformanceReceptors, AMPAReceptors, Ionotropic GlutamateReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSaccadesSpace Perception6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dioneExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsReceptors, AMPAReceptors, Ionotropic GlutamateReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateAMPARmacaque monkeyNMDARPFCworking memory

Identifiers

PMID32051326
PMCPMC7083532
OpenAlexW3005985912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.