Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32051311›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

1000 Families Study, a UK multiwave cohort investigating the well-being of families of children with intellectual disabilities: cohort profile.

Richard P Hastings, Vasiliki Totsika, Nikita K Hayden, Caitlin A Murray, Mikeda Jess, Emma Langley, Jane Kerry Margetson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Modelling triadic relationships in families of children with intellectual disability.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Failure to replicate a robust Down syndrome advantage for maternal well-being.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Richard P HastingsCentre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research (CEDAR), University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0495-8270
Vasiliki TotsikaCentre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research (CEDAR), University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1702-2727
Nikita K HaydenCentre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research (CEDAR), University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1104-3885
Caitlin A MurrayCentre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research (CEDAR), University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK C.Murray.7@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7547-736X
Mikeda JessCentre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research (CEDAR), University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK.
Emma LangleyCentre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research (CEDAR), University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6311-1734
Jane Kerry MargetsonCentre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research (CEDAR), University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3068-2076
University of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe 1000 Families Study is a large, UK-based, cohort of families of children with intellectual disability (ID). The main use of the cohort data will be to describe and explore correlates of the well-being of families of children with ID, including parents and siblings, using cross-sectional and (eventually) longitudinal analyses. The present cohort profile intends to describe the achieved cohort.

participantsOver 1000 families of UK children with ID aged between 4 and 15 years 11 months (total n=1184) have been recruited. The mean age of the cohort was 9.01 years old. The cohort includes more boys (61.8%) than girls (27.0%; missing 11.1%). Parents reported that 45.5% (n=539) of the children have autism. Most respondents were a female primary caregiver (84.9%), and 78.0% were the biological mother of the cohort child with ID. The largest ethnic group for primary caregivers was White British (78.5%), over half were married and living with their partner (53.3%) and 39.3% were educated to degree level. FINDINGS TO DATE: Data were collected on family, parental and child well-being, as well as demographic information. Wave 1 data collection took place between November 2015 and January 2017, primarily through online questionnaires. Telephone interviews were also completed by 644 primary caregivers. FUTURE PLANS: Wave 2 data collection is ongoing and the research team will continue following up these families in subsequent waves, subject to funding availability. Results will be used to inform policy and practice on family and child well-being in families of children with ID. As this cohort profile aims to describe the cohort, future publications will explore relevant research questions and report key findings related to family well-being.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessPersonal SatisfactionAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolChildren with DisabilitiesCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFamily RelationsFemaleHumansIntellectual DisabilityMaleParentsSiblingsSocioeconomic Factorsfamily researchintellectual disabilitylongitudinalwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID32051311
PMCPMC7045113
OpenAlexW3006501075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.