Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32051250›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

TOR dynamically regulates plant cell-cell transport.

Jacob O Brunkard, Min Xu, M Regina Scarpin, Snigdha Chatterjee, Elena A Shemyakina, Howard M Goodman, Patricia Zambryski

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genetic suppressor ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular advances in bud dormancy in trees.Journal of experimental botany · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacob O BrunkardDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley CA 94720; brunkard@berkeley.edu zambrysk@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6407-9393
Min XuDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley CA 94720.
M Regina ScarpinDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley CA 94720.
Snigdha ChatterjeeDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley CA 94720.
Elena A ShemyakinaDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley CA 94720.
Howard M GoodmanDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley CA 94720.
Patricia ZambryskiDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley CA 94720; brunkard@berkeley.edu zambrysk@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2901-0320
Innovative Genomics Institute · USPlant Gene Expression Center · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USNorthwest University · CN

Funding

VIRAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL REGULATION OF PLASMODESMATAR01GM045244 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ZAMBRYSKI, PATRICIA C. · 1991 to 2012
$2.6M
An aminoacyl tRNA synthetase is a nitrogen sensor that activates TOR in plantsDP5OD023072 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BRUNKARD, JACOB O · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
Genome Sequencer FLXS10RR029668 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI NGAI, JOHN J. · 2010 to 2010
$623k
Illumina Sequencer to Facilitate Functional Genomics at BerkeleyS10RR027303 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI TAYLOR, JOHN W. · 2010 to 2010
$500k
A Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope for the Biological Imaging Facility at the US10RR026866 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI RUZIN, STEVEN EARL · 2010 to 2010
$419k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR026866NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR027303NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR029668NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM045244NIH HHS DP5 OD023072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coordinated redistribution of sugars from mature "source" leaves to developing "sink" leaves requires tight regulation of sugar transport between cells via plasmodesmata (PD). Although fundamental to plant physiology, the mechanisms that control PD transport and thereby support development of new leaves have remained elusive. From a forward genetic screen for altered PD transport, we discovered that the conserved eukaryotic glucose-TOR (TARGET OF RAPAMYCIN) metabolic signaling network restricts PD transport in leaves. Genetic approaches and chemical or physiological treatments to either promote or disrupt TOR activity demonstrate that glucose-activated TOR decreases PD transport in leaves. We further found that TOR is significantly more active in mature leaves photosynthesizing excess sugars than in young, growing leaves, and that this increase in TOR activity correlates with decreased rates of PD transport. We conclude that leaf cells regulate PD trafficking in response to changing carbohydrate availability monitored by the TOR pathway.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsBiological TransportCarbohydrate MetabolismGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene Knockdown TechniquesGene SilencingNicotianaPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPlant CellsPlant LeavesPlasmodesmataProtein TransportSignal TransductionArabidopsis ProteinsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesTOR protein, Arabidopsiscell–cell signalingplasmodesmatarapamycinReptinTARGET OF RAPAMYCIN

Identifiers

PMID32051250
PMCPMC7060719
OpenAlexW3006170152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.