Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32051191›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2020

Insights from Adopting a Data Commons Approach for Large-scale Observational Cohort Studies: The California Teachers Study.

James V Lacey, Nadia T Chung, Paul Hughes, Jennifer L Benbow, Christine Duffy, Kristen E Savage, Emma S Spielfogel, Sophia S Wang, Maria Elena Martinez, Sandeep Chandra

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

James V LaceyDepartment of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, California. jlacey@coh.org.
Nadia T ChungDepartment of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
Paul HughesSherlock, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California.
Jennifer L BenbowDepartment of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
Christine DuffyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5627-3401
Kristen E SavageDepartment of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, California.ORCID 0000-0002-6676-712X
Emma S SpielfogelDepartment of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
Sophia S WangDepartment of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
Maria Elena MartinezDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California.
Sandeep ChandraSherlock, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California.
City of Hope · USSan Diego Supercomputer Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of San Diego · US

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Jesse Nodora · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
Transgenic Mouse FacilityP30CA033572 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI XIWEI WU · 1985 to 2026
$86.3M
CALIFORNIA TEACHERS STUDYR01CA077398 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BERNSTEIN, LESLIE · 1998 to 2014
$29.7M
Oil and Gas as Drivers of Climate Change and Health: Developing unique resources to investigate multi-level and diverse effects of exposure to oil and gas wellsU01CA199277 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI LACEY, JAMES V, MARTINEZ, MARIA ELENA · 2015 to 2024
$20.7M
New Biospecimens to Enhance Research in the California Teachers Study CohortUM1CA164917 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI LACEY, JAMES V · 2012 to 2015
$10.1M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS NU58DP006344NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800009CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800009INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800015CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800015INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032INCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100NCI NIH HHS P30 CA033572NCI NIH HHS R01 CA077398NCI NIH HHS U01 CA199277NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA164917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge-scale cancer epidemiology cohorts (CEC) have successfully collected, analyzed, and shared patient-reported data for years. CECs increasingly need to make their data more findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable, or FAIR. How CECs should approach this transformation is unclear.

methodsThe California Teachers Study (CTS) is an observational CEC of 133,477 participants followed since 1995-1996. In 2014, we began updating our data storage, management, analysis, and sharing strategy. With the San Diego Supercomputer Center, we deployed a new infrastructure based on a data warehouse to integrate and manage data and a secure and shared workspace with documentation, software, and analytic tools that facilitate collaboration and accelerate analyses.

resultsOur new CTS infrastructure includes a data warehouse and data marts, which are focused subsets from the data warehouse designed for efficiency. The secure CTS workspace utilizes a remote desktop service that operates within a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)- and Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA)-compliant platform. Our infrastructure offers broad access to CTS data, includes statistical analysis and data visualization software and tools, flexibly manages other key data activities (e.g., cleaning, updates, and data sharing), and will continue to evolve to advance FAIR principles.

conclusionsOur scalable infrastructure provides the security, authorization, data model, metadata, and analytic tools needed to manage, share, and analyze CTS data in ways that are consistent with the NCI's Cancer Research Data Commons Framework. IMPACT: The CTS's implementation of new infrastructure in an ongoing CEC demonstrates how population sciences can explore and embrace new cloud-based and analytics infrastructure to accelerate cancer research and translation.

Indexed as

Big DataCloud ComputingComputer SecurityData CollectionData WarehousingHealth Information ManagementHealth Insurance Portability and Accountability ActHumansLongitudinal StudiesNeoplasmsObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32051191
PMCPMC9005205
OpenAlexW3006519482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.