Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32051016›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2020

Assembly of hundreds of novel bacterial genomes from the chicken caecum.

Laura Glendinning, Robert D Stewart, Mark J Pallen, Kellie A Watson, Mick Watson

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 88 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 187 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. SCiMS: Sex Calling in Metagenomic Sequences.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Distinct classes of gut bacterial molybdenum-dependent enzymes produce urolithins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura GlendinningGenetics and Genomics, The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK. laura.glendinning@roslin.ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4789-6644
Robert D StewartGenetics and Genomics, The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Mark J PallenMicrobes in the Food Chain, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich, UK.
Kellie A WatsonGenetics and Genomics, The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Mick WatsonGenetics and Genomics, The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Roslin Institute · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004235/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004243/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P013732/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P013759/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R012504/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20320000Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/F/000PR10351Medical Research Council MR/L015080/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChickens are a highly important source of protein for a large proportion of the human population. The caecal microbiota plays a crucial role in chicken nutrition through the production of short-chain fatty acids, nitrogen recycling, and amino acid production. In this study, we sequence DNA from caecal content samples taken from 24 chickens belonging to either a fast or a slower growing breed consuming either a vegetable-only diet or a diet containing fish meal.

resultsWe utilise 1.6 T of Illumina data to construct 469 draft metagenome-assembled bacterial genomes, including 460 novel strains, 283 novel species, and 42 novel genera. We compare our genomes to data from 9 European Union countries and show that these genomes are abundant within European chicken flocks. We also compare the abundance of our genomes, and the carbohydrate active enzymes they produce, between our chicken groups and demonstrate that there are both breed- and diet-specific microbiomes, as well as an overlapping core microbiome.

conclusionsThis data will form the basis for future studies examining the composition and function of the chicken caecal microbiota.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeGenome, BacterialMetagenomeAnimalsCecumChickensCaecaChickenMAGMetagenomeMicrobial ecologyMicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID32051016
PMCPMC7014784
OpenAlexW3007869025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.