Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32051015›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2020

Reliability and correlation of mixture cell correction in methylomic and transcriptomic blood data.

Boris Chaumette, Oussama Kebir, Patrick A Dion, Guy A Rouleau, Marie-Odile Krebs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Boris ChaumetteDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. boris.chaumette@inserm.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1313-2788
Oussama KebirUniversité de Paris, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, 102-108 Rue de la Santé, 75014, Paris, France.
Patrick A DionMontreal Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Guy A RouleauMontreal Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Marie-Odile KrebsUniversité de Paris, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, 102-108 Rue de la Santé, 75014, Paris, France.

Funding

Ministère de la santé (FR) AOM-07-118Ministère de la santé (FR) PHRC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe number of DNA methylome and RNA transcriptome studies is growing, but investigators have to consider the cell type composition of tissues used. In blood samples, the data reflect the picture of a mixture of different cells. Specialized algorithms can address the cell-type heterogeneity issue. We tested if these corrections are correlated between two heterogeneous datasets.

resultsWe used methylome and transcriptome datasets derived from a cohort of ten individuals whose blood was sampled at two different timepoints. We examined how the cell composition derived from these omics correlated with each other using "CIBERSORT" for the transcriptome and "estimateCellCounts function" in R for the methylome. The correlation coefficients between the two omic datasets ranged from 0.45 to 0.81 but correlations were minimal between two different timepoints. Our results suggest that a posteriori correction of a mixture of cells present in blood samples is reliable. Using an omic dataset to correct a second dataset for relative fractions of cells appears to be applicable, but only when the samples are simultaneously collected. This could be beneficial when there are difficulties to control the cell types in the second dataset, even when the sample size is limited.

Indexed as

EpigenomeTranscriptomeBloodCohort StudiesGenomicsHumansReproducibility of ResultsChipDNALeucocytesRNASequencing

Identifiers

PMID32051015
PMCPMC7017605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.