Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32050960›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

How does the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist fit with existing perioperative risk management strategies? An ethnographic study across surgical specialties.

Hilde Valen Wæhle, Arvid Steinar Haugen, Siri Wiig, Eirik Søfteland, Nick Sevdalis, Stig Harthug

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Influence of a checklist -based management model on postoperative complication rates and hospitalization time after metabolic and bariatric surgery.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Scalable policy adoption and sustainable implementation of surgical care in the Americas.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hilde Valen WæhleDepartment of Research and Development, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Liesvei 65, N-5021, Bergen, Norway. hilde.valen.waehle@helse-bergen.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0435-1647
Arvid Steinar HaugenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Siri WiigCentre for Resilience in Healthcare (SHARE), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Eirik SøftelandDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Nick SevdalisCentre for Implementation Science, Health Service & Population Research Department, King's College London, London, UK.
Stig HarthugDepartment of Research and Development, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Liesvei 65, N-5021, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

Helse Vest HV1172Helse Vest HV1174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) has demonstrated beneficial impacts on a range of patient- and team outcomes, though variation in SSC implementation and staff's perception of it remain challenging. Precisely how frontline personnel integrate the SSC with pre-existing perioperative clinical risk management remains underexplored - yet likely an impactful factor on how SSC is being used and its potential to improve clinical safety. This study aimed to explore how members of the multidisciplinary perioperative team integrate the SSC within their risk management strategies.

methodsAn ethnographic case study including observations (40 h) in operating theatres and in-depth interviews of 17 perioperative team members was carried out at two hospitals in 2016. Data were analysed using content analysis.

resultsWe identified three themes reflecting the integration of the SSC in daily surgical practice: 1) Perceived usefullness; implying an intuitive advantage assessment of the SSC's practical utility in relation to relevant work; 2) Modification of implementation; reflecting performance variability of SSC on confirmation of items due to precence of team members; barriers of performance; and definition of SSC as performance indicator, and 3) Communication outside of the checklist; including formal- and informal micro-team formations where detailed, specific risk communication unfolded.

conclusionWhen the SSC is not integrated within existing risk management strategies, but perceived as an "add on", its fidelity is compromised, hence limiting its potential clinical effectiveness. Implementation strategies for the SSC should thus integrate it as a risk-management tool and include it as part of risk-management education and training. This can improve team learning around risk comunication, foster mutual understanding of safety perspectives and enhance SSC implementation.

Indexed as

ChecklistPerioperative CareSpecialties, SurgicalAnthropology, CulturalFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleObservationOperating RoomsProspective StudiesQualitative ResearchRisk ManagementWorld Health OrganizationEthnographyHealth services researchPatient safetyQuality improvementSurgical safety checklist

Identifiers

PMID32050960
PMCPMC7017532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.