Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32050959›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical genomics2020

Amniotic fluid cell-free transcriptome: a glimpse into fetal development and placental cellular dynamics during normal pregnancy.

Adi L Tarca, Roberto Romero, Roger Pique-Regi, Percy Pacora, Bogdan Done, Marian Kacerovsky, Gaurav Bhatti, Sunil Jaiman, Sonia S Hassan, Chaur-Dong Hsu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Prenatal body fluid analysis in the evaluation of CAKUT.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Human Plasma Proteome During Normal Pregnancy.Journal of proteome research · 2022
    Article
  16. Single-Cell Immunobiology of the Maternal-Fetal Interface.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adi L TarcaPerinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, 𝐸𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝐾𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑑𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS), Detroit, MI, USA. atarca@med.wayne.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1712-7588
Roberto RomeroPerinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, 𝐸𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝐾𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑑𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS), Detroit, MI, USA. prbchiefstaff@med.wayne.edu.
Roger Pique-RegiPerinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, 𝐸𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝐾𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑑𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS), Detroit, MI, USA.
Percy PacoraPerinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, 𝐸𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝐾𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑑𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS), Detroit, MI, USA.
Bogdan DonePerinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, 𝐸𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝐾𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑑𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS), Detroit, MI, USA.
Marian KacerovskyPerinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, 𝐸𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝐾𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑑𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS), Detroit, MI, USA.
Gaurav BhattiPerinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, 𝐸𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝐾𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑑𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS), Detroit, MI, USA.
Sunil JaimanPerinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, 𝐸𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝐾𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑑𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS), Detroit, MI, USA.
Sonia S HassanPerinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, 𝐸𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝐾𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑑𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS), Detroit, MI, USA.
Chaur-Dong HsuPerinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, 𝐸𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝐾𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑑𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS), Detroit, MI, USA.
Nardhy Gomez-LopezPerinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, 𝐸𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝐾𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑑𝑦 𝑆ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS), Detroit, MI, USA. nardhy.gomez-lopez@wayne.edu.
National Institutes of Health · USUnited States Department of Health and Human Services · US

Funding

NICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201300006C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe amniotic fluid (AF) cell-free transcriptome is modulated by physiologic and pathologic processes during pregnancy. AF gene expression changes with advancing gestation reflect fetal development and organ maturation; yet, defining normal expression and splicing patterns for biomarker discovery in obstetrics requires larger heterogeneous cohorts, evaluation of potential confounding factors, and novel analytical approaches.

methodsWomen with a normal pregnancy who had an AF sample collected during midtrimester (n = 30) or at term gestation (n = 68) were included. Expression profiling at exon level resolution was performed using Human Transcriptome Arrays. Differential expression was based on moderated t-test adjusted p < 0.05 and fold change > 1.25; for differential splicing, a splicing index > 2 and adjusted p < 0.05 were required. Functional profiling was used to interpret differentially expressed or spliced genes. The expression of tissue-specific and cell-type specific signatures defined by single-cell genomics was quantified and correlated with covariates. In-silico validation studies were performed using publicly available datasets.

results1) 64,071 genes were detected in AF, with 11% of the coding and 6% of the non-coding genes being differentially expressed between midtrimester and term gestation. Expression changes were highly correlated with those previously reported (R > 0.79, p < 0.001) and featured increased expression of genes specific to the trachea, salivary glands, and lung and decreased expression of genes specific to the cardiac myocytes, uterus, and fetal liver, among others. 2) Single-cell RNA-seq signatures of the cytotrophoblast, Hofbauer cells, erythrocytes, monocytes, T and B cells, among others, showed complex patterns of modulation with gestation (adjusted p < 0.05). 3) In 17% of the genes detected, we found differential splicing with advancing gestation in genes related to brain development processes and immunity pathways, including some that were missed based on differential expression analysis alone.

conclusionsThis represents the largest AF transcriptomics study in normal pregnancy, reporting for the first time that single-cell genomic signatures can be tracked in the AF and display complex patterns of expression during gestation. We also demonstrate a role for alternative splicing in tissue-identity acquisition, organ development, and immune processes. The results herein may have implications for the development of fetal testing to assess placental function and fetal organ maturity.

Indexed as

AdultAmniotic FluidFemaleFetal DevelopmentGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansLongitudinal StudiesOrganogenesisPlacentaPregnancyProspective StudiesTranscriptomeCell-free RNADifferential expressionDifferential splicingFetal sexGestational ageMaternal obesitySingle-cell genomic signatureTissue-specific signature

Identifiers

PMID32050959
PMCPMC7017452
OpenAlexW3008009778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.