Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32050923›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Knowledge, attitudes and practices assessment of malaria interventions in rural Zambia.

Desmond T Jumbam, Jennifer C Stevenson, Japhet Matoba, John P Grieco, Lacey N Ahern, Busiku Hamainza, Chadwick H Sikaala, Pascalina Chanda-Kapata, Esther I Cardol, Passwell Munachoonga and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Efficacy of a spatial repellent for control ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Malaria signs, symptoms, prevention knowledge and its associated factors among rural Ethiopians.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Desmond T JumbamDepartment of Biological Sciences, Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA. desmond.jumbam@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3062-2519
Jennifer C StevensonJohns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Japhet MatobaMacha Research Trust, Choma, Zambia.
John P GriecoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.
Lacey N AhernDepartment of Biological Sciences, Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.
Busiku HamainzaNational Malaria Control Centre, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Chadwick H SikaalaNational Malaria Control Centre, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Pascalina Chanda-KapataMinistry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Esther I CardolMacha Research Trust, Choma, Zambia.
Passwell MunachoongaMacha Research Trust, Choma, Zambia.
Nicole L AcheeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.
University of Notre Dame · USMinistry of Health · ZMGolden Valley Agricultural Research Trust · ZMJohns Hopkins University · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1081737Macha Malaria Research Institute N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite rapid upscale of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), malaria remains a major source of morbidity and mortality in Zambia. Uptake and utilization of these and novel interventions are often affected by knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) amongst persons living in malaria-endemic areas. The aims of this study were to assess malaria KAP of primary caregivers and explore trends in relation to ITN use, IRS acceptance and mosquito density in two endemic communities in Luangwa and Nyimba districts, Zambia.

methodsA cohort of 75 primary caregivers were assessed using a cross-sectional, forced-choice malaria KAP survey on ITN use, IRS acceptance and initial perception of a novel spatial repellent (SR) product under investigation. Entomological sampling was performed in participant homes using CDC Miniature Light Traps to relate indoor mosquito density with participant responses.

resultsNinety-nine percent of participants cited bites of infected mosquitoes as the route of malaria transmission although other routes were also reported including drinking dirty water (64%) and eating contaminated food (63%). All caregivers agreed that malaria was a life-threatening disease with the majority of caregivers having received malaria information from health centers (86%) and community health workers (51%). Cumulatively, self-reported mosquito net use was 67%. Respondents reportedly liked the SR prototype product but improvements on color, shape and size were suggested. Overall, 398 mosquitoes were captured from light-trap collections, including 49 anophelines and 349 culicines. Insecticide treated nets use was higher in households from which at least one mosquito was captured.

conclusionsThe current study identified misconceptions in malaria transmission among primary caregivers indicating remaining knowledge gaps in educational campaigns. Participant responses also indicated a misalignment between a low perception of IRS efficacy and high stated acceptance of IRS, which should be further examined to better understand uptake and sustainability of other vector control strategies. While ITNs were found to be used in study households, misperceptions between presence of mosquitoes and bite protection practices did exist. This study highlights the importance of knowledge attitudes and practice surveys, with integration of entomological sampling, to better guide malaria vector control product development, strategy acceptance and compliance within endemic communities.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeRural PopulationAdultCaregiversCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHousingHumansInsecticidesInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaMosquito ControlZambiaInsecticidesAnd practices (KAP)AttitudesIRSITNKnowledgeMalariaSpatial repellentsZambia

Identifiers

PMID32050923
PMCPMC7017631
OpenAlexW3006385945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.