Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32050909›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2020

Osteoporosis management in Australian general practice: an analysis of current osteoporosis treatment patterns and gaps in practice.

Pradnya Naik-Panvelkar, Sarah Norman, Zain Elgebaly, Jeff Elliott, Allan Pollack, Jill Thistlethwaite, Clare Weston, Markus J Seibel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Osteoporosis and post-fracture management in the primary care setting: a systematic review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  6. A new age of osteoanabolic therapy? A real-world, two-centre study comparing effects of romosozumab, teriparatide, and antiresorptive therapies for osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Osteoporosis screening in Australian community pharmacies: A mixed methods study.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Assessing Decision Fatigue in General Practitioners' Prescribing Decisions Using the Australian BEACH Data Set.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pradnya Naik-PanvelkarNPS MedicineWise, Level 7, 418A, Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills, NSW, 2010, Australia. PNaikpanvelkar@nps.org.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8949-5051
Sarah NormanNPS MedicineWise, Level 7, 418A, Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills, NSW, 2010, Australia.
Zain ElgebalyNPS MedicineWise, Level 7, 418A, Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills, NSW, 2010, Australia.
Jeff ElliottNPS MedicineWise, Level 7, 418A, Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills, NSW, 2010, Australia.
Allan PollackNPS MedicineWise, Level 7, 418A, Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills, NSW, 2010, Australia.
Jill ThistlethwaiteNPS MedicineWise, Level 7, 418A, Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills, NSW, 2010, Australia.
Clare WestonNPS MedicineWise, Level 7, 418A, Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills, NSW, 2010, Australia.
Markus J SeibelDepartment of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, The University of Sydney and Bone Research Program, ANZAC Research Institute, Concord, NSW, 2139, Australia.
Marvell (Israel) · ILThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong Australians aged 50 and over, an estimated 1 in 4 men and 2 in 5 women will experience a minimal trauma fracture during their remaining lifetime. Effective fracture prevention is hindered by substantial undertreatment, even of patients who clearly warrant pharmacological therapy. Poor adherence to osteoporosis treatment is also a leading cause of repeat fractures and hospitalisation. The aim of this study was to identify current osteoporosis treatment patterns and gaps in practice in Australia, using general practice data, and to explore general practitioners' (GPs') attitudes to osteoporosis treatment and their views on patient factors affecting osteoporosis management.

methodsThe study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 was a longitudinal retrospective cohort study which utilised data from MedicineInsight - a national general practice data program that extracts longitudinal, de-identified patient data from clinical information systems (CISs) of participating general practices. Phase 2 included semi-structured, in-depth telephone interviews with a sample of MedicineInsight practice GPs. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis method informed by the theory of planned behaviour.

resultsA diagnosis of osteoporosis was recorded in 12.4% of patients over the age of 50 years seen in general practice. Of those diagnosed with osteoporosis, almost a quarter were not prescribed osteoporosis medicines. From 2012 to 17, there was a progressive increase in the number of denosumab prescriptions, while prescriptions for bisphosphonates and other osteoporosis medicines decreased. More than 80% of patients who ceased denosumab treatment had no subsequent bisphosphonate prescription recorded. Interviews with GPs revealed beliefs and attitudes that may have influenced their intentions towards prescribing and osteoporosis management.

conclusionsThis study suggests that within the Australian general practice setting, osteoporosis is underdiagnosed and undertreated. In addition, it appears that most patients who ceased denosumab treatment had no record of subsequent antiresorptive therapy, which would place them at risk of further fractures. The study supports the need for the development of clinical education programs addressing GP knowledge gaps and attitudes, and the implementation of specific interventions such as good reminder/recall systems to avoid delays in reviewing and treating patients with osteoporosis.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGeneral PractitionersAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabDeprescriptionsDiphosphonatesDrug SubstitutionFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabDiphosphonatesNorpregnenesRaloxifene Hydrochloridestrontium ranelateTeriparatideThiophenestiboloneAdherenceBisphosphonatesDenosumabGP perspectivesOsteoporosisPractice gapsPrimary careTreatment patterns

Identifiers

PMID32050909
PMCPMC7014771
OpenAlexW3007042372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.