ArticleBMC family practice2020
Osteoporosis management in Australian general practice: an analysis of current osteoporosis treatment patterns and gaps in practice.
Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2024 Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and Healthy Bones Australia guideline for osteoporosis management and fracture prevention in postmenopausal women and men over 50 years of age.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025Guideline
- Perspectives of healthcare providers on osteoporosis, falls and fracture risk: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.Archives of osteoporosis · 2024Pooled it
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences of osteoporosis medication treatment: a qualitative systematic review.Archives of osteoporosis · 2024Pooled it
- Mind the gap: Adherence to denosumab dosing and cessation guidelines in Australian residential aged care.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Osteoporosis and post-fracture management in the primary care setting: a systematic review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Review
- A new age of osteoanabolic therapy? A real-world, two-centre study comparing effects of romosozumab, teriparatide, and antiresorptive therapies for osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
- Professional positioning of general practitioners in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis in community medicine.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- The impact of DXA findings on general practitioners' decision regarding first-line oral bisphosphonates in postmenopausal osteoporosis-data from French General Practice (the IMOGENE study).Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Article
- Implementation of a Modified Fracture Liaison Service at Aarhus University Hospital: A 2-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.Calcified tissue international · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a Novel Web-Based Active Learning Tool for Primary Care Physicians' Continuing Professional Development (The Community Fracture Capture Learning Hub): Quantitative Analysis.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- The global, regional, and national burden attributable to low bone mineral density, 1990-2020: an analysis of a modifiable risk factor from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.The Lancet. Rheumatology · 2025Article
- First-line treatment of osteoporosis with osteoanabolic therapy: a new opportunity.Internal medicine journal · 2025Review
- Effects of Protocol-driven Care by Internists on Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hip Fracture Surgery Patients: An Interrupted Time Series Study Using a Nationwide Inpatient Database.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- Developing and Evaluating an Interactive, Case-Based, Web-Based Active Learning Tool for Primary Care Physicians (Community Fracture Capture Learning Hub): Protocol for an Acceptability and Engagement Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Biochemical and Demographical Differences in Atypical vs. Typical Femoral Fractures: A 10-Year Experience Across Two Centers.International journal of endocrinology · 2025Article
- Risk prediction of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in postmenopausal osteoporotic women by machine learning modelling.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Osteoporosis screening in Australian community pharmacies: A mixed methods study.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025Article
- Standalone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Without Supplementary Posterior Fixation Is Effective for Treatment of Symptomatic Grade 1 Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.International journal of spine surgery · 2024Article
- The evaluation of an osteoporosis medication management service in community pharmacy, a cohort study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- Assessing Decision Fatigue in General Practitioners' Prescribing Decisions Using the Australian BEACH Data Set.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmong Australians aged 50 and over, an estimated 1 in 4 men and 2 in 5 women will experience a minimal trauma fracture during their remaining lifetime. Effective fracture prevention is hindered by substantial undertreatment, even of patients who clearly warrant pharmacological therapy. Poor adherence to osteoporosis treatment is also a leading cause of repeat fractures and hospitalisation. The aim of this study was to identify current osteoporosis treatment patterns and gaps in practice in Australia, using general practice data, and to explore general practitioners' (GPs') attitudes to osteoporosis treatment and their views on patient factors affecting osteoporosis management.
methodsThe study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 was a longitudinal retrospective cohort study which utilised data from MedicineInsight - a national general practice data program that extracts longitudinal, de-identified patient data from clinical information systems (CISs) of participating general practices. Phase 2 included semi-structured, in-depth telephone interviews with a sample of MedicineInsight practice GPs. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis method informed by the theory of planned behaviour.
resultsA diagnosis of osteoporosis was recorded in 12.4% of patients over the age of 50 years seen in general practice. Of those diagnosed with osteoporosis, almost a quarter were not prescribed osteoporosis medicines. From 2012 to 17, there was a progressive increase in the number of denosumab prescriptions, while prescriptions for bisphosphonates and other osteoporosis medicines decreased. More than 80% of patients who ceased denosumab treatment had no subsequent bisphosphonate prescription recorded. Interviews with GPs revealed beliefs and attitudes that may have influenced their intentions towards prescribing and osteoporosis management.
conclusionsThis study suggests that within the Australian general practice setting, osteoporosis is underdiagnosed and undertreated. In addition, it appears that most patients who ceased denosumab treatment had no record of subsequent antiresorptive therapy, which would place them at risk of further fractures. The study supports the need for the development of clinical education programs addressing GP knowledge gaps and attitudes, and the implementation of specific interventions such as good reminder/recall systems to avoid delays in reviewing and treating patients with osteoporosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.