Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32050645›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Physiological and Pathological Roles of RAD52 at DNA Replication Forks.

Eva Malacaria, Masayoshi Honda, Annapaola Franchitto, Maria Spies, Pietro Pichierri

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. RAD52 prevents accumulation ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Making Choices: DNA Replication Fork Recovery Mechanisms.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. RNA: a double-edged sword in genome maintenance.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva MalacariaMechanisms, Biomarkers and Models section, Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Masayoshi HondaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 51 Newton Road, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Annapaola FranchittoMechanisms, Biomarkers and Models section, Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Maria SpiesDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 51 Newton Road, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Pietro PichierriMechanisms, Biomarkers and Models section, Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · ITUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

The Role of Human RAD52 Protein in Genome StabilityR01CA232425 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Maria Spies · 2019 to 2026
$3.1M
Regulation of unwinding and remodeling activities in FeS-DNA helicasesR01GM108617 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SPIES, MARIA · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro 21428Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro IG 19971NCI NIH HHS R01 CA232425NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108617NIH HHS CA232425NIH HHS GM108617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding basic molecular mechanisms underlying the biology of cancer cells is of outmost importance for identification of novel therapeutic targets and biomarkers for patient stratification and better therapy selection. One of these mechanisms, the response to replication stress, fuels cancer genomic instability. It is also an Achille's heel of cancer. Thus, identification of pathways used by the cancer cells to respond to replication-stress may assist in the identification of new biomarkers and discovery of new therapeutic targets. Alternative mechanisms that act at perturbed DNA replication forks and involve fork degradation by nucleases emerged as crucial for sensitivity of cancer cells to chemotherapeutics agents inducing replication stress. Despite its important role in homologous recombination and recombinational repair of DNA double strand breaks in lower eukaryotes, RAD52 protein has been considered dispensable in human cells and the full range of its cellular functions remained unclear. Very recently, however, human RAD52 emerged as an important player in multiple aspects of replication fork metabolism under physiological and pathological conditions. In this review, we describe recent advances on RAD52's key functions at stalled or collapsed DNA replication forks, in particular, the unexpected role of RAD52 as a gatekeeper, which prevents unscheduled processing of DNA. Last, we will discuss how these functions can be exploited using specific inhibitors in targeted therapy or for an informed therapy selection.

Indexed as

genome stabilityRAD52replication fork recoveryreplication fork reversaltarget therapy

Identifiers

PMID32050645
PMCPMC7072239
OpenAlexW3004728159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.